IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i5p1352-1360..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group composition effects on aggressive interpack interactions of gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park

Author

Listed:
  • Kira A. Cassidy
  • Daniel R. MacNulty
  • Daniel R. Stahler
  • Douglas W. Smith
  • L. David Mech

Abstract

Knowledge of characteristics that promote group success during intraspecific encounters is key to understanding the adaptive advantages of sociality for many group-living species. In addition, some individuals in a group may be more likely than others to influence intergroup conflicts, a relatively neglected idea in research on social animals. Here we use observations of aggressive interactions between wolf (Canis lupus) packs over an extended period and use pack characteristics to determine which groups had an advantage over their opponents. During 16 years of observation in Yellowstone National Park from 1995 to 2010, we documented 121 interpack aggressive interactions. We recorded pack sizes, compositions, and spatial orientation related to residency to determine their effects on the outcomes of interactions between packs. Relative pack size (RPS) improved the odds of a pack displacing its opponent. However, pack composition moderated the effect of RPS as packs with relatively more old members (>6.0 years old) or adult males had higher odds of winning despite a numerical disadvantage. The location of the interaction with respect to pack territories had no effect on the outcome of interpack interactions. Although the importance of RPS in successful territorial defense suggests the evolution and maintenance of group living may be at least partly due to larger packs’ success during interpack interactions, group composition is also an important factor, highlighting that some individuals are more valuable than others during interpack conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Kira A. Cassidy & Daniel R. MacNulty & Daniel R. Stahler & Douglas W. Smith & L. David Mech, 2015. "Group composition effects on aggressive interpack interactions of gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1352-1360.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:5:p:1352-1360.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holly A. MacCormick & Daniel R. MacNulty & Anna L. Bosacker & Clarence Lehman & Andrea Bailey & D. Anthony Collins & Craig Packer, 2012. "Male and female aggression: lessons from sex, rank, age, and injury in olive baboons," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 684-691.
    2. Simona Cafazzo & Paola Valsecchi & Roberto Bonanni & Eugenia Natoli, 2010. "Dominance in relation to age, sex, and competitive contexts in a group of free-ranging domestic dogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 443-455.
    3. Daniel R. MacNulty & Douglas W. Smith & L. David Mech & John A. Vucetich & Craig Packer, 2012. "Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 75-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dongryul Lee & Pilwon Kim, 2018. "Group formation under limited resources: narrow basin of equality," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Glowacki, Luke & Wilson, Michael L. & Wrangham, Richard W., 2020. "The evolutionary anthropology of war," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 963-982.
    3. Crouse, Kristin N. & Desai, Nisarg P. & Cassidy, Kira A. & Stahler, Erin E. & Lehman, Clarence L. & Wilson, Michael L., 2022. "Larger territories reduce mortality risk for chimpanzees, wolves, and agents: Multiple lines of evidence in a model validation framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    4. Sells, Sarah N. & Mitchell, Michael S., 2020. "The economics of territory selection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simona Cafazzo & Roberto Bonanni & Paola Valsecchi & Eugenia Natoli, 2014. "Social Variables Affecting Mate Preferences, Copulation and Reproductive Outcome in a Pack of Free-Ranging Dogs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Roberto Bonanni & Simona Cafazzo & Arianna Abis & Emanuela Barillari & Paola Valsecchi & Eugenia Natoli, 2017. "Age-graded dominance hierarchies and social tolerance in packs of free-ranging dogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1004-1020.
    3. Laura Menchetti & Silvia Calipari & Chiara Mariti & Angelo Gazzano & Silvana Diverio, 2020. "Cats and dogs: Best friends or deadly enemies? What the owners of cats and dogs living in the same household think about their relationship with people and other pets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Peña, Jorge & Heifetz, Aviad & Nöldeke, Georg, 2023. "The shirker’s dilemma and the prospect of cooperation in large groups," IAST Working Papers 23-152, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST), revised Oct 2023.
    5. Lisa J Wallis & Ivaylo B Iotchev & Enikő Kubinyi, 2020. "Assertive, trainable and older dogs are perceived as more dominant in multi-dog households," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:5:p:1352-1360.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.