IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v83y2001i4p958-971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycled Effluent: Should the Polluter Pay?

Author

Listed:
  • Eli Feinerman
  • Yakir Plessner
  • Dafna M. DiSegni Eshel

Abstract

A coastal city can either dispose of recycled effluent by dumping it in the sea, or transfer it to farmers in its hinterland for irrigation. Who should bear the cost of recycling? Three alternatives are employed: a central planner who maximizes the combined utility of city and farmers; regulation by prices, for which purpose we develop the city's supply function;and a bargaining framework for the allocation of costs. The main conclusions are that “the polluter pays” rule cannot be justified in principle and that bargaining may result in inefficiency. We demonstrate with an example from Israel that essentially conforms to the theoretical structure. Copyright 2001, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Eli Feinerman & Yakir Plessner & Dafna M. DiSegni Eshel, 2001. "Recycled Effluent: Should the Polluter Pay?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(4), pages 958-971.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:83:y:2001:i:4:p:958-971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/0002-9092.00222
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reznik, Ami & Feinerman, Eli & Finkelshtain, Israel & Fisher, Franklin & Huber-Lee, Annette & Joyce, Brian & Kan, Iddo, 2017. "Economic implications of agricultural reuse of treated wastewater in Israel: A statewide long-term perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 222-233.
    2. Ami Reznik & Ariel Dinar, 2022. "Local conditions and the economic feasibility of urban wastewater recycling in irrigated agriculture: Lessons from a stochastic regional analysis in California," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 2115-2130, December.
    3. Hurlimann, Anna C., 2009. "Water supply in regional Victoria Australia: A review of the water cartage industry and willingness to pay for recycled water," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 262-268.
    4. Luckmann, Jonas & Ihle, Rico & Kleinwechter, Ulrich & Grethe, Harald, 2015. "The Effects of Vietnamese Export Policies on the World Market Integration of Domestic Rice Markets," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212159, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Gilad Axelrad & Eli Feinerman, 2009. "Regional Planning of Wastewater Reuse for Irrigation and River Rehabilitation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 105-131, February.
    6. Ami Reznik & Ariel Dinar & Francesc Hernández-Sancho, 2019. "Treated Wastewater Reuse: An Efficient and Sustainable Solution for Water Resource Scarcity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(4), pages 1647-1685, December.
    7. Fei Han & Junming Li, 2022. "Spatial Pattern and Spillover of Abatement Effect of Chinese Environmental Protection Tax Law on PM 2.5 Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Luckmann, Jonas & Grethe, Harald & McDonald, Scott, 2015. "When Water Saving Limits Recycling: Modeling Economy-wide Linkages of Wastewater Use," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212161, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Shuai Chen & Jiameng Yang, 2023. "Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance Pricing and the Solvency of Insurance Companies in China: Based on the Black–Scholes Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Luckmann, Jonas & Grethe, Harald & McDonald, Scott, 2015. "When Water Saving Limits Recycling: Modeling Cascading Water Use in a Computable General Equilibrium Framework," Conference papers 332622, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:83:y:2001:i:4:p:958-971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.