IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v75y1993ispecial_issuep25-40..html

Keeping the Dream of Rigorous Hypothesis Testing Alive

Author

Listed:
  • Quirino Paris
  • Michael R. Caputo
  • Garth J. Holloway

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Quirino Paris & Michael R. Caputo & Garth J. Holloway, 1993. "Keeping the Dream of Rigorous Hypothesis Testing Alive," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(Special_I), pages 25-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:75:y:1993:i:special_issue:p:25-40.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/75_Special_Issue.25
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomek, William G., 1998. "Structural Econometric Models: Past and Future (with Special Reference to Agricultural Economics Applications)," 1981-1999 Conference Archive 285730, NCR-134/ NCCC-134 Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    2. Atanu Saha & C. Richard Shumway, 1998. "Refutable implications of the firm model under risk," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 441-448.
    3. MacAulay, T. Gordon, 1995. "Games, Clubs And Models: The Economics Of An Agricultural Economics Society," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 39(01), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Meszaros, Sandor, 2008. "Theory testing (hypothesis testing) in agricultural economics," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 107, pages 1-13, March.
    5. Yougesh Khatri & Colin Thirtle, 1996. "Supply And Demand Functions For Uk Agriculture: Biases Of Technical Change And The Returns To Public R&D," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 338-354, January.
    6. Liu, Yucan & Shumway, C. Richard, 2005. "Empirical Tests of the Refutable Implications of Expected Utility Maximization under Risk," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19331, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Detre, Joshua D. & Foster, Kenneth A., 2004. "Indirect Utility Functions And Testable Conditions," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20087, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Robison, Lindon J. & Colyer, Dale, 1994. "Reflections on Relevance of Professional Journals," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 19-34, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:75:y:1993:i:special_issue:p:25-40.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.