IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2013i2p561-571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Change In Economic Education Through A Learning By Doing Program (Practeam)

Author

Listed:
  • Botezat Elena-Aurelia

    (University of Oradea,)

Abstract

Entrepreneurial universities have emerged as a consequence of survival in a global competitive environment. It is for that reason change in economic education becomes so important. The aim of this paper is to discuss how well learning-by-doing programs could be used and produce significant and sustainable results in Romanian universities used the results of the implementation of a learning-by-doing program (PRACTeam). The project "The practice of economics students. An inter-regional partnership on the labor market between universities and the business field" (PRACTeam) developed starting from the 1st of October 2010 for a period of three years by three partners working together: the University of Oradea - Faculty of Economics, the West University of Timiºoara - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, the University "Ștefan cel Mare" of Suceava - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration. For students in the second year undergraduate programs, 180 students/year from each of the three Universities partners, time for practical internship is 90 hours, 6 hours / day, during three weeks. Place of internship for students in undergraduate studies is provided by various units (private companies, public institutions, NGOs) under certain partnership agreements, as well as Framework Convention, which specifies the rights and obligations of the parties involved. The internship- units appoint a tutor, who will guide the undergraduate students during the internship, this is do in collaboration with an representant of the university. Methodology-wise the paper relies upon a qualitative research approach that includes interviews with twelve undergraduate students, systematic Observation (using the PRACTeam Selection Sheet and PRACTeam Sheet of practical skills) as well as secondary data regarding knowing and showing what you know. It is anticipated that a quantitative approach could be used for a follow-up work which can test capacity for generalisation of this paper`s findings. Thus it would be interesting to know whether this increase educational effectiveness through †learning by doing†- basically it is maintained over time (e.g. in the master studies). What would we expect after completing this program is to determine a change, the undergraduates to be transform. How can we improve learning? One way to enhance "learning" is through "by doing". If you want the graduates to learn about business, they must be put in situation to see it with their own eyes how it works, or even how it to do. It is a shift from a learning model based primarily on the reproduction of information from one based on producing results using information. In the economic education by including "Learning by Doing" - program PRACTeam, undergraduates are encouraged to prefer the questions, rather than the imperatives: "how to be done?", instead of "you must do it!".

Suggested Citation

  • Botezat Elena-Aurelia, 2013. "Managing Change In Economic Education Through A Learning By Doing Program (Practeam)," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 561-571, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:561-571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2013/n2/054.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaokai Yang & Jeff Borland, 2005. "A Microeconomic Mechanism For Economic Growth," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: An Inframarginal Approach To Trade Theory, chapter 18, pages 409-436, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4cufqrm9749dbol0m0bsfeopka is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Xavier Ragot, 2003. "Croissance et division du travail," Post-Print hal-03475968, HAL.
    3. Peretto, P. & Smulders, J.A., 1998. "Specialization, Knowledge Dilution, and Scale Effects in an IO-Based Growth Model," Other publications TiSEM 167c9440-7cc2-481e-a673-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Ben Fine, 1998. "Endogenous Growth Theory: A Critical Assessment," Working Papers 80, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    5. Tamura, Robert, 2002. "Human capital and the switch from agriculture to industry," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 207-242, December.
    6. Shiro Kuwahara & Akihisa Shibata, 2006. "The Role Of Expectations In A Specialization-Driven Growth Model With Endogenous Technology Choice," Division of Labor & Transaction Costs (DLTC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(01), pages 55-69.
    7. Xiaokai Yang, 2006. "The Division Of Labor, Investment And Capital," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Christis Tombazos & Xiaokai Yang (ed.), Inframarginal Contributions To Development Economics, chapter 16, pages 409-436, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Swisher IV, S. N., 2017. "Reassessing Railroads and Growth: Accounting for Transport Network Endogeneity," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1718, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    9. Lewis S. Davis, 1998. "The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs and the Growth of Government," Departmental Working Papers 199803, Department of Economics, SUNY-Oswego, revised 01 Dec 1998.
    10. Davis, Lewis S., 2003. "The division of labor and the growth of government," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 1217-1235, May.
    11. Pan, Xiaojun & Li, Shoude, 2016. "Dynamic optimal control of process–product innovation with learning by doing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 136-145.
    12. Robert Cromley & Dean Hanink, 2008. "Population growth and the development of a central place system," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 383-405, December.
    13. Xavier Ragot, 2003. "Croissance et division du travail," Post-Print hal-03475968, HAL.
    14. Steven Levitt & John List & Chad Syverson, 2012. "Toward an Understanding of Learning by Doing: Evidence from an Automobile Plant," Natural Field Experiments 00463, The Field Experiments Website.
    15. Steven D. Levitt & John A. List & Chad Syverson, 2013. "Toward an Understanding of Learning by Doing: Evidence from an Automobile Assembly Plant," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(4), pages 643-681.
    16. Lundborg, Petter & James, Stefan & Lagerqvist, Bo & Vikström, Johan, 2021. "Learning-by-Doing and Productivity Growth among High-Skilled Workers: Evidence from the Treatment of Heart Attacks," IZA Discussion Papers 14744, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Phillips, Kerk L., 2010. "A Dynamic Model of Specialization and Market Development as Engines of Economic Growth," MPRA Paper 23500, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Hollanders, Hugo & Weel, Bas ter, 1999. "Skill-Biased Technical Change: On Endogenous Growth, Wage Inequality and Government Intervention," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. Bjarne S. Jensen & Ulla Lehmijoki, 2010. "Solution and Phase Portraits of Endogenous Growth Models with Optimal Saving," DEGIT Conference Papers c015_004, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    20. Schuh, G. Edward, 1991. "Open Economies: Implications For Global Agriculture," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271358, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    21. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2007_003 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Steve Dowrick, 2003. "Ideas and Education: Level or Growth Effects?," NBER Working Papers 9709, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    management; change; economic education; learning-by-doing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:561-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.