IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/govkaa/5l4qpl6lk15h.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Service Reform in China

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Burns

Abstract

The Chinese government has undertaken extensive reforms to its civil service system over the past ten years. The capacity of the civil service has improved, but perhaps due to reasons other than civil service reform. This article reviews the government reforms in the context of the particular nature of the Chinese civil service system, and makes recommendations for further reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Burns, 2007. "Civil Service Reform in China," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5l4qpl6lk15h
    DOI: 10.1787/budget-v7-art3-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v7-art3-en
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/budget-v7-art3-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kwan Nok Chan & Shiwei Fan, 2021. "Friction and bureaucratic control in authoritarian regimes," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1406-1418, October.
    2. Alfred Wu & Mi Lin, 2012. "Determinants of government size: evidence from China," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 255-270, April.
    3. Gianluca Ferraro & Marleen Brans, 2012. "Trade‐offs between environmental protection and economic development in China's fisheries policy: A political analysis on the adoption and implementation of the Fisheries Law 2000," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 36(1), pages 38-49, February.
    4. Peiyi Lu & Ying Liang, 2016. "Health-Related Quality of Life of Young Chinese Civil Servants Working in Local Government: Comparison of SF-12 and EQ5D," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 1445-1464, December.
    5. Maryam Tanwir & Azam Chaudhry, 2016. "Reforming a Broken System: A New Performance Evaluation System for Pakistan Civil Servants," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(1), pages 49-72.
    6. Fischer, A.M. & Zenz, A., 2016. "The evolution of Tibetan representation and preferentiality in public employment during the Post-fenpei period in China: Insights from new data sources," ISS Working Papers - General Series 620, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    7. Gans-Morse, Jordan & Borges, Mariana & Makarin, Alexey & Mannah-Blankson, Theresa & Nickow, Andre & Zhang, Dong, 2018. "Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 171-188.
    8. Shahid Yusuf, 2014. "Middle East Transitions: A Long, Hard Road," IMF Working Papers 2014/135, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli & Maimanah Mohammed Idris & Penlope Yaguma, 2022. "The importance of institutional quality: Reviewing the relevance of Indonesia’s Omnibus Law on national competitiveness," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5l4qpl6lk15h. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.