IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/govkaa/5km8xx3mp60n.html

Is New Public Management Really Dead?

Author

Listed:
  • Jouke de Vries

Abstract

This article, originally presented as a keynote speech at the June 2009 meeting of the OECD Working Party of Senior Budget Officials, explores the state of new public management from the perspective of current political theory and presents relevant findings from a 2009 OECD comparative study, “Value for Money”. JEL classification: H830. Keywords: New public management; NPM; public administration; Dunleavy; public governance reform; value for money.

Suggested Citation

  • Jouke de Vries, 2010. "Is New Public Management Really Dead?," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5km8xx3mp60n
    DOI: 10.1787/budget-10-5km8xx3mp60n
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Terrance Molobela & Dominique Emmanuel Uwizeyimana, 2023. "New public management and post-new public management paradigms: Deconstruction and reconfiguration of the South African public administration," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(8), pages 327-334, November.
    2. Carrai, Maria Adele, 2021. "Adaptive governance along Chinese-financed BRI railroad megaprojects in East Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Wennström, Johan, 2015. "The Complex Roots of Deprofessionalization: A Case Study of New Public Management," Working Paper Series 1087, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 11 Aug 2016.
    4. Davlasheridze, Meri & Fisher-Vanden, Karen & Allen Klaiber, H., 2017. "The effects of adaptation measures on hurricane induced property losses: Which FEMA investments have the highest returns?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 93-114.
    5. Palaco, Ileana & Park, Min Jae & Kim, Suk Kyoung & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2019. "Public–private partnerships for e-government in developing countries: An early stage assessment framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 205-218.
    6. Martin Kniepert, 2017. "Bringing Institutions into Economics when Teaching Economics as a Minor Subject," Working Papers 702017, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    7. Lothar Walter & Alfred Radauer & Martin G. Moehrle, 2017. "The beauty of brimstone butterfly: novelty of patents identified by near environment analysis based on text mining," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 103-115, April.
    8. repec:rnp:ppaper:nvg111 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Curran, Louise, 2024. "Investor state dispute settlement (ISDS) and the social licence to operate of international business: An analysis of controversial cases," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5km8xx3mp60n. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.