IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is New Public Management Really Dead?


  • Jouke de Vries


This article, originally presented as a keynote speech at the June 2009 meeting of the OECD Working Party of Senior Budget Officials, explores the state of new public management from the perspective of current political theory and presents relevant findings from a 2009 OECD comparative study, “Value for Money”. JEL classification: H830. Keywords: New public management; NPM; public administration; Dunleavy; public governance reform; value for money.

Suggested Citation

  • Jouke de Vries, 2010. "Is New Public Management Really Dead?," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5km8xx3mp60n
    DOI: 10.1787/budget-10-5km8xx3mp60n

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Martin Kniepert, 2017. "Bringing Institutions into Economics when Teaching Economics as a Minor Subject," Working Papers 702017, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna.
    2. Lothar Walter & Alfred Radauer & Martin G. Moehrle, 2017. "The beauty of brimstone butterfly: novelty of patents identified by near environment analysis based on text mining," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 103-115, April.
    3. Wennström, Johan, 2015. "The Complex Roots of Deprofessionalization: A Case Study of New Public Management," Working Paper Series 1087, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 11 Aug 2016.
    4. Davlasheridze, Meri & Fisher-Vanden, Karen & Allen Klaiber, H., 2017. "The effects of adaptation measures on hurricane induced property losses: Which FEMA investments have the highest returns?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 93-114.
    5. repec:eee:epplan:v:72:y:2019:i:c:p:205-218 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5km8xx3mp60n. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.