IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v69y2016i2p415-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Local Property Taxes Regressive, Progressive, or What?

Author

Listed:
  • Wallace E. Oates
  • William A. Fischel

Abstract

Local property taxes are commonly regarded as regressive, but the two dominant (and competing) views of the property tax would disagree. Under the capital-tax view, the national element of the tax is a tax on real estate capital, which makes it somewhat inefficient but progressive, given the distribution of ownership of real property. Under the benefit view, the local component of the property tax is not really a tax but a fee for service. We describe evidence that the capital-tax view applies in relatively undeveloped areas, while the benefit view is more relevant in developed urban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Wallace E. Oates & William A. Fischel, 2016. "Are Local Property Taxes Regressive, Progressive, or What?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 69(2), pages 415-434, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:69:y:2016:i:2:p:415-434
    DOI: 10.1086/NTJ44014529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ44014529
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/NTJ44014529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maiterth, Ralf & Piper, Yuri & Sureth, Caren, 2024. "Liquiditätseffekte einer Vermögensteuer bei Mietwohnimmobilien," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 286, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Michael Wasylenko, 2017. "Financing Central Cities: The Economics Underlying Fiscal Strategy Options With Special Reference to Syracuse City and the Consensus Report," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 204, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    3. Momi Dahan, 2023. "Social Construction And The Progressivity Of Local Tax Relief," Israel Economic Review, Bank of Israel, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, March.
    4. Löffler, Max & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2015. "Property Taxation, Local Labor Markets and Rental Housing," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112967, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Iuliia Shybalkina, 2021. "The role of organized groups in administrative burdens of property taxation," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 4(1).
    6. David J. Schwegman & John Yinger, 2020. "The Shifting of the Property Tax on Urban Renters: Evidence from New York State�s Homestead Tax Option," Working Papers 20-43, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    7. Daniel McMillen & Ruchi Singh, 2020. "Assessment Regressivity and Property Taxation," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 155-169, February.
    8. Vejchodská, Eliška & Barreira, Ana Paula & Auziņš, Armands & Jürgenson, Evelin & Fowles, Steven & Maliene, Vida, 2022. "Bridging land value capture with land rent narratives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Rotberg, Shahar & Steinberg, Joseph B., 2024. "Mortgage interest deductions? Not a bad idea after all," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Murray, Cameron & Hermans, Jesse Benjamin, 2019. "Land value is a progressive and efficient property tax base: Evidence from Victoria," OSF Preprints mxg3j, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:69:y:2016:i:2:p:415-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.