IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2019i4p133-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalization of Mentoring as a Resource for Professional Development of Russian Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Arkady Margolis
  • Elena Arzhanykh
  • Margarita Khusnutdinova

Abstract

Arkady Margolis - Candidate of Sciences in Psychology, Interim Rector, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education. E-mail: margolisaa@mgppu.ruElena Arzhanykh - Head of the Department for Research Project and Event Planning and Coordination, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education. E-mail: arzhanyhev@mgppu.ruMargarita Khusnutdinova - Candidate of Sciences in Sociology, Head of the Data Analytics Sector of the Department for Research Project and Event Planning and Coordination, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education. E-mail: husnutdinovaMR@mgppu.ruAddress: 29 Sretenka Str., 127051 Moscow, Russian Federation.Results of a sociological study are used to analyze the major problems of mentoring early-career educators, and arguments are provided to support statutory recognition of mentors for novice school teachers and the mentoring system as such. The study was conducted by members of the MSUPE Center for Applied Psychological and Pedagogical Research jointly with scholars from five regional universities. It involved 25 interviews with school administrators (principals and head teachers) as well as questionnaire surveys of beginning teachers (work experience of under five years, age under 30) and their experienced colleagues. The total sample consisted of 490 teachers (150 new and 430 experienced) employed with federal and municipal institutions of general education.Findings show that the main barriers to effective mentoring include (i) novice teachers being unaware of their professional deficiencies and the need to be mentored by experts, (ii) experienced teachers being unwilling to mentor because of status, workload and pay uncertainties, and (iii) administrators paying inadequate attention to systematization of novice teacher professional adaptation.Institutionalization is required to allow further development of the mentoring system in Russian schools. Statutory regulation of mentoring implies introducing relevant job positions, elaborating mentor job duties, determining the size and sources of pay, creating a system of mentor selection and training, and defining the content and major forms of mentoring programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkady Margolis & Elena Arzhanykh & Margarita Khusnutdinova, 2019. "Institutionalization of Mentoring as a Resource for Professional Development of Russian Teachers," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 133-159.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2019:i:4:p:133-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2019/12/12/1524287624/07%20Margolis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avraamova, Elena & Klyachko, Tatiana (Клячко, Татьяна) & Loginov, Dmitriy (Логинов, Дмитрий) & Tokareva, Galina (Токарева, Галина), 2017. "Efficiency of School Education: Teachers' View [Эффективность Школьного Образования: Позиция Учителей]," Working Papers 031707, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatyana Klyachko & Elena Semionova & Galina Tokareva, 2020. "School Staffing: Teachers' Perceptions," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 232-249.
    2. Марголис А. А. & Аржаных Е. В. & Хуснутдинова М. Р., 2019. "Институционализация Наставничества Как Ресурс Профессионального Развития Российских Педагогов," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 133-159.
    3. Клячко Т. Л. & Семионова Е. А. & Токарева Г. С., 2020. "Кадровая Ситуация В Школе: Мнение Учителей," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 232-249.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2019:i:4:p:133-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.