IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2011i3p192-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of educational programs by unified state exam results of enrolled students

Author

Abstract

The authors of the current article used distributions of the sum score of Russian unified state exam of accepted students to compare training programs. The authors propose quantitative and qualitative indicators of the differences between the programs. The effects of the bundle of programs by unified state exam's score are illustrated by an empirical analysis of admission campaigns in some schools in 2009 and 2010.DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2011-3-192-209

Suggested Citation

  • Oleg Poldin & Andrey Silaev, 2011. "Comparison of educational programs by unified state exam results of enrolled students," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 192-209.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2011:i:3:p:192-209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Poldin, Oleg & Silaeva, Vera & Silaev, Andrey, 2014. "Comparing quality of admission to universities by the results of olympiads and unified state exams scores," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 36(4), pages 118-132.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2011:i:3:p:192-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.