IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2014i2p7-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the effectiveness of the program-target method of public administration reform: the experience of Russia

Author

Abstract

The article makes a comparison of effectiveness between two Federal programs of public administration reforming in Russia (2003-2007, and 2009-2013). It substantiates the statements: 1) the existing international ratings are not meant for revealing public administration reforming eff ectiveness; 2) effectiveness of public administration reforming can only be evaluated, if reforms are held with the help of the program-target method; 3) the system of effectiveness indicators that was designed for the second Federal program of reforming public service in Russia, is well applicable to evaluate other program-target reforms of public administration; 4) the compared effectiveness indicators show that the first Federal program of reforms is less effective than the second one.The general conclusion of the article is drawn as follows: the program-target method of reforming public administration makes it possible to measure the dynamics of reforming in objective indicators, reveal progressive changes in public service. These changes are invisible if one separate program of reforming is taken; moreover, a local regress within the frame of one program is quite possible. However every new program as an aggregate of reform undertakings, promotes perfection of public service, increase of its professionalism and transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexey Barabashev & Alexey Kindras, 2014. "On the effectiveness of the program-target method of public administration reform: the experience of Russia," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 7-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2014:i:2:p:7-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2014/10/29/1099532315/%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%B2,%20%D0%9A%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B0%D1%8C.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Transparency International TI, 2012. "Corruption Perceptions Index 2012," Working Papers id:5186, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. George Borshchevskiy, 2015. "The application of quantitative methods for the study of civil service reform," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 147-172.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cannizzaro, Anthony P. & Weiner, Robert J., 2015. "Multinational investment and voluntary disclosure: Project-level evidence from the petroleum industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 32-47.
    2. Goran Dostic & Zdravko Todorovic & Igor Todorovic, 2013. "International Aid And Principal-Agent Relationship: Evidence From Bosnia And Herzegovina," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 9(1), pages 115-126.
    3. Springate-Baginski, Oliver & Thein, Aung Kyaw & Neil, Anthony & Thu, Win Myo & Doherty, Faith, 2014. "Democratising timber: An assessment of Myanmar's emerging ‘Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade’ (FLEGT) process," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 33-45.
    4. Fiona M Underwood & Robert W Burn & Tom Milliken, 2013. "Dissecting the Illegal Ivory Trade: An Analysis of Ivory Seizures Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Fernando Reboredo, 2013. "Socio-economic, environmental, and governance impacts of illegal logging," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 295-304, June.
    6. Patricia Crifo & Marc-Arthur Diaye & Rim Oueghlissi, 2014. "Measuring the effect of government ESG performance on sovereign borrowing cost," CIRANO Working Papers 2014s-37, CIRANO.
    7. Shouro Dasgupta & Enrica De Cian, 2016. "Institutions and the Environment: Existing Evidence and Future Directions," Working Papers 2016.41, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    8. David R. Borker, 2016. "Gauging the Impact of Country-Specific Values on the Acceptability of Global Management Accounting Principles," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 149-164.
    9. Bartha, Zoltán & Sáfrányné Gubik, Andrea & Tóthné Szita, Klára, 2013. "Intézményi megoldások, fejlődési modellek [Institutional solutions, development models]," MPRA Paper 50901, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Eugen Dimant & Guglielmo Tosato, 2018. "Causes And Effects Of Corruption: What Has Past Decade'S Empirical Research Taught Us? A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 335-356, April.
    11. Finlay Jim & Kassar Abdul-Nassar & Neal Mark, 2013. "Can Business Education Change Management Practices In Non-Western Societies: Lessons From Lebanon," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 113-122, July.
    12. Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Patricia Crifo & Marc-Arthur Diaye & Rim Oueghlissi & Bert Scholtens, 2016. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance and sovereign bond spreads: an empirical analysis of OECD countries," Working Papers hal-01401718, HAL.
    13. Manuel Fernandez & Aysha Abdulla Ahmed Aljeed Alnuaimi & Robinson Joseph, 2020. "FDI Environment in China: A Critical Analysis," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 238-253, October.
    14. Abbink, Klaus & Dasgupta, Utteeyo & Gangadharan, Lata & Jain, Tarun, 2014. "Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 17-28.
    15. Shashank Priya & Chittaranjan Satapathy, 2014. "Enhancing Regional Connectivity: Towards a Regional Arrangement for the Facilitation of Cross-border Paperless Trade," Studies in Trade and Investment 78, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    16. Rosa Forte & Nancy Santos, 2015. "A cluster analysis of FDI in Latin America," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 52(1), pages 25-56, May.
    17. Lindemann, Henrik, 2015. "Budgetary Interests and the Degree of Unbundling in Electricity Markets - An Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-543, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    18. Radziah Mahmud & Nor Khadijah Mohd Azhari & Rosmini Mohd Aripin & Humayun Kabir & Abongile Zweni, 2023. "Malaysian Local Authorities: Are They Transparent?," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 1-46, August.
    19. Rahim M. Quazi, 2014. "Effects Of Corruption And Regulatory Environment On Foreign Direct Investment: A Case Study Of Africa," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(4), pages 51-60.
    20. Sheheryar Banuri & Catherine Eckel, 2015. "Cracking down on bribery," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(3), pages 579-600, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2014:i:2:p:7-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.