IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/itrzhq/11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of the possibilities of market-ecological transformation of the institutional environment for forest sector of economics

Author

Listed:
  • Suska Anastasiy

    (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture)

  • Babich Anatoly

    (Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National University of Air Force)

Abstract

The processes of formation and functioning of the market for social and ecological forest services depend to a large extent on the availability of an institutional support system that establishes rules and norms for the behavior of market subjects. The practice of institutionalizing new economic systems shows that the basis for designing and organizing the institutions of the new economic system is the existing institutional environment of the economic space, a certain development of which is the new economic system. Such institutionalization strategy envisages the evolutionary development of existing institutions in terms of their adaptation to new economic (ecological and economic) conditions, will allow maintaining existing inter-branch relations, saving financial and material resources. The possibility of implementing the evolutionary strategy of institutionalization of the market of social and ecological services of forests as a new ecological and economic system of the forest sector of the economy is determined by the degree of market-ecological orientation of the main regulatory and legal acts of forestry. Prospects for the transformation of basic legislative acts (formal institutions) to new economic conditions are determined using the method of institutional analysis, conducted according to groups of normative legal acts and their functional purpose. Institutional analysis of program and conceptual institutions of forestry development has shown that these institutions are largely outdated and do not define such direction of development as capitalization of social and ecological forest benefits. This requires updating the program documents and setting priorities for the integrated use of the natural forest resource. The main political and legal acts of the institutional environment of the forestry sector of the economy have a certain market-ecological orientation, it allows to determine the strategy of institutionalization of the market of social and ecological forest services as an evolutionary development of the existing institutional environment of forestry. The existing financial and economic institutions of the institutional forestry environment provide for the financing of activities for the conservation of an environmentally safe environment through a number of environmental taxes, the possible development of such institutions can be the legal coverage of financial flows that can be formed during the capitalization of social and ecological forest benefits. The absence of domestic experience and the institutionalization of ecological and economic systems in forestry require considerable efforts to study foreign experience and create conditions for the import of certain institutions and their adaptation to the conditions of forestry in Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Suska Anastasiy & Babich Anatoly, 2017. "Estimation of the possibilities of market-ecological transformation of the institutional environment for forest sector of economics," Technology audit and production reserves, 5(37) 2017, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 5(5(37)), pages 4-8.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:itrzhq:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/111555
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhaskar Vira, 1997. "The Political Coase Theorem: Identifying Differences between Neoclassical and Critical Institutionalism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 761-780, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Élodie Bertrand, 2006. "La thèse d'efficience du « théorème de Coase ». Quelle critique de la microéconomie ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(5), pages 983-1007.
    2. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 227-253, April.
    3. Trent J. MacDonald, 2019. "The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18871.
    4. Weinstein, Olivier, 2013. "Comment comprendre les « communs » : Elinor Ostrom, la propriété et la nouvelle économie institutionnelle," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    5. Vahabi,Mehrdad, 2019. "The Political Economy of Predation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107591370, January.
    6. Prévost, Benoît & Rivaud, Audrey, 2018. "The World Bank’s environmental strategies: Assessing the influence of a biased use of New Institutional Economics on legal issues," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 370-380.
    7. Helge Peukert, 2001. "Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller and Douglass C. North, Seen with Oldinstitutionalists' Eyes," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 91-130, March.
    8. Steven G. Medema, 2020. "The Coase Theorem at Sixty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1045-1128, December.
    9. ., 2019. "Economic theory of non-territorial unbundling," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit, chapter 1, pages 14-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    forest sector institutions; formal institutions; informal institutions; institutional environment; ecological and legal aspects;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L73 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Forest Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:itrzhq:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.