IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v583y2020i7815d10.1038_s41586-020-2448-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Beerling

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Euripides P. Kantzas

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Mark R. Lomas

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Peter Wade

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Rafael M. Eufrasio

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Phil Renforth

    (Heriot-Watt University)

  • Binoy Sarkar

    (Lancaster University)

  • M. Grace Andrews

    (University of Southampton)

  • Rachael H. James

    (University of Southampton)

  • Christopher R. Pearce

    (National Oceanography Centre)

  • Jean-Francois Mercure

    (University of Exeter
    Cambridge Centre for Energy, Environment and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge)

  • Hector Pollitt

    (Cambridge Centre for Energy, Environment and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge
    Cambridge Econometrics)

  • Philip B. Holden

    (The Open University)

  • Neil R. Edwards

    (Cambridge Centre for Energy, Environment and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge
    The Open University)

  • Madhu Khanna

    (University of Illinois)

  • Lenny Koh

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Shaun Quegan

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Nick F. Pidgeon

    (Cardiff University)

  • Ivan A. Janssens

    (University of Antwerp)

  • James Hansen

    (Columbia University)

  • Steven A. Banwart

    (University of Leeds
    University of Leeds)

Abstract

Enhanced silicate rock weathering (ERW), deployable with croplands, has potential use for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) removal (CDR), which is now necessary to mitigate anthropogenic climate change1. ERW also has possible co-benefits for improved food and soil security, and reduced ocean acidification2–4. Here we use an integrated performance modelling approach to make an initial techno-economic assessment for 2050, quantifying how CDR potential and costs vary among nations in relation to business-as-usual energy policies and policies consistent with limiting future warming to 2 degrees Celsius5. China, India, the USA and Brazil have great potential to help achieve average global CDR goals of 0.5 to 2 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year with extraction costs of approximately US$80–180 per tonne of CO2. These goals and costs are robust, regardless of future energy policies. Deployment within existing croplands offers opportunities to align agriculture and climate policy. However, success will depend upon overcoming political and social inertia to develop regulatory and incentive frameworks. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of ERW deployment, including the potential for excess industrial silicate materials (basalt mine overburden, concrete, and iron and steel slag) to obviate the need for new mining, as well as uncertainties in soil weathering rates and land–ocean transfer of weathered products.

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Beerling & Euripides P. Kantzas & Mark R. Lomas & Peter Wade & Rafael M. Eufrasio & Phil Renforth & Binoy Sarkar & M. Grace Andrews & Rachael H. James & Christopher R. Pearce & Jean-Francois , 2020. "Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands," Nature, Nature, vol. 583(7815), pages 242-248, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:583:y:2020:i:7815:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2448-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2448-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2448-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2448-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Terre Satterfield & Sara Nawaz & Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent, 2023. "Exploring public acceptability of direct air carbon capture with storage: climate urgency, moral hazards and perceptions of the ‘whole versus the parts’," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Samaniego, Joseluis & Lorenzo, Santiago & Rondón Toro, Estefani & Krieger Merico, Luiz F. & Herrera Jiménez, Juan & Rouse, Paul & Harrison, Nicholas, 2023. "Nature-based solutions and carbon dioxide removal," Documentos de Proyectos 48691, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2020. "New Approaches for Ecological and Social Sustainability in a Post-Pandemic World," World, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Oppon, Eunice & Richter, Justin S. & Koh, S.C. Lenny & Nabayiga, Hellen, 2023. "Macro-level economic and environmental sustainability of negative emission technologies; Case study of crushed silicate production for enhanced weathering," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    5. Xiaolin Yang & Jinran Xiong & Taisheng Du & Xiaotang Ju & Yantai Gan & Sien Li & Longlong Xia & Yanjun Shen & Steven Pacenka & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Shaozhong Kang & Klaus But, 2024. "Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Daniel M. Franks & Julia Keenan & Degol Hailu, 2023. "Mineral security essential to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 21-27, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:583:y:2020:i:7815:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2448-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.