IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v494y2013i7436d10.1038_494149a.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Fanelli

    (Daniele Fanelli is a research fellow at the University of Edinburgh, UK.)

Abstract

To make misconduct more difficult, the scientific community should ensure that it is impossible to lie by omission, argues Daniele Fanelli.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Fanelli, 2013. "Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting," Nature, Nature, vol. 494(7436), pages 149-149, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:494:y:2013:i:7436:d:10.1038_494149a
    DOI: 10.1038/494149a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/494149a
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/494149a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gall, Thomas & Maniadis, Zacharias, 2019. "Evaluating solutions to the problem of false positives," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 506-515.
    2. Daniele Fanelli & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2013. "Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Klaas Sijtsma, 2016. "Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Zhiwen Hu & Yiping Cui & Jian Zhang & Jacqueline Eviston-Putsch, 2020. "Shalosh B. Ekhad: a computer credit for mathematicians," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 71-97, January.
    5. Leandro Fórnias Machado de Rezende & Juan Pablo Rey-López & Thiago Hérick de Sá & Nicholas Chartres & Alice Fabbri & Lauren Powell & Emmanuel Stamatakis & Lisa Bero, 2018. "Reporting bias in the literature on the associations of health-related behaviors and statins with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Weiss, Matthias & Nair, Lakshmi B. & Hoorani, Bareerah H. & Gibbert, Michael & Hoegl, Martin, 2023. "Transparency of reporting practices in quantitative field studies: The transparency sweet spot for article citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    7. Klaas Sijtsma & Coosje Veldkamp & Jelte Wicherts, 2016. "Improving the Conduct and Reporting of Statistical Analysis in Psychology," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 33-38, March.
    8. Michał Krawczyk, 2015. "The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Fei Wang & Chaowen Zhu, 2023. "Statistical analysis of research integrity construction in 466 Chinese universities with medical programs," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Lutz Bornmann, 2013. "Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent," Publications, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Tošić, Aleksandar & Vičič, Jernej, 2021. "Use of Benford's law on academic publishing networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:494:y:2013:i:7436:d:10.1038_494149a. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.