IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v447y2007i7147d10.1038_nature05900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recuperation of nitrogen cycling in Amazonian forests following agricultural abandonment

Author

Listed:
  • Eric A. Davidson

    (The Woods Hole Research Center, 149 Woods Hole Road, Falmouth, Massachusetts 02540-1644, USA)

  • Cláudio J. Reis de Carvalho

    (EMBRAPA Amazônia Oriental, C. P. 48, Belém, PA 66.095-100, Brazil)

  • Adelaine Michela Figueira

    (CENA, University of São Paulo, Avenue Centenário, 303, Piracicaba, SP 13.416-000, Brazil)

  • Françoise Yoko Ishida

    (CENA, University of São Paulo, Avenue Centenário, 303, Piracicaba, SP 13.416-000, Brazil)

  • Jean Pierre H. B. Ometto

    (CENA, University of São Paulo, Avenue Centenário, 303, Piracicaba, SP 13.416-000, Brazil)

  • Gabriela B. Nardoto

    (CENA, University of São Paulo, Avenue Centenário, 303, Piracicaba, SP 13.416-000, Brazil)

  • Renata Tuma Sabá

    (EMBRAPA Amazônia Oriental, C. P. 48, Belém, PA 66.095-100, Brazil)

  • Sanae N. Hayashi

    (Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, PA 66.040-179, Brazil)

  • Eliane C. Leal

    (Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, PA 66.040-179, Brazil)

  • Ima Célia G. Vieira

    (Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, PA 66.040-179, Brazil)

  • Luiz A. Martinelli

    (CENA, University of São Paulo, Avenue Centenário, 303, Piracicaba, SP 13.416-000, Brazil)

Abstract

Nitrogen does the rounds Some 16% of the original Amazon forest has been cleared for agriculture, but much of that land is no longer in use and is starting to regrow. Such 'secondary forests' are becoming increasingly important as tropical land-use change results in larger areas that have gone through agricultural phases. A new study of Amazon forest areas between 3 and 70 years into their recovery reveals nitrogen and phosphorus cycling processes consistent with large losses of nitrogen during land use change. Nitrogen availability is ephemeral, and readily disrupted by either natural or anthropogenic disturbance. Understanding how the nutrient cycling processes of secondary forest succession should contribute to the better management Amazonian ecosystems. Elsewhere in the nitrogen cycle, an analysis of virtually all extant data on open oceanic nitrification, in conjunction with a global ecosystem model, demonstrates that the generally accepted assumptions concerning its distribution are incorrect. Much of the nitrate taken up by the oceans is generated through recent nitrification near the surface and, at the global scale, nitrification accounts for about half of the nitrate consumed by growing phytoplankton. This means that many previous attempts to quantify marine carbon export may be significant overestimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric A. Davidson & Cláudio J. Reis de Carvalho & Adelaine Michela Figueira & Françoise Yoko Ishida & Jean Pierre H. B. Ometto & Gabriela B. Nardoto & Renata Tuma Sabá & Sanae N. Hayashi & Eliane C. Le, 2007. "Recuperation of nitrogen cycling in Amazonian forests following agricultural abandonment," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7147), pages 995-998, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:447:y:2007:i:7147:d:10.1038_nature05900
    DOI: 10.1038/nature05900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05900
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature05900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Müller-Hansen, Finn & Heitzig, Jobst & Donges, Jonathan & Cardoso, Manoel F. & Dalla-Nora, Eloi L. & Andrade, Pedro R. & Kurths, Jürgen & Thonicke, Kirsten, 2019. "Can intensification of cattle ranching reduce deforestation in the Amazon? Insights from an agent-based social-ecological model," SocArXiv x5q9j, Center for Open Science.
    2. Stefan Hohnwald & Osvaldo Ryohei Kato & Helge Walentowski, 2019. "Accelerating Capoeira Regeneration on Degraded Pastures in the Northeastern Amazon by the Use of Pigs or Cattle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Müller-Hansen, Finn & Heitzig, Jobst & Donges, Jonathan F. & Cardoso, Manoel F. & Dalla-Nora, Eloi L. & Andrade, Pedro & Kurths, Jürgen & Thonicke, Kirsten, 2019. "Can Intensification of Cattle Ranching Reduce Deforestation in the Amazon? Insights From an Agent-based Social-Ecological Model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 198-211.
    4. Zhang, Jing & Chen, Ying Ying & Liu, Wen Hui & Guo, Zheng Gang, 2021. "Effect of alternate partial root-zone drying (PRD) on soil nitrogen availability to alfalfa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Katrina Mullan & Erin Sills & Subhrendu K. Pattanayak & Jill Caviglia-Harris, 2018. "Converting Forests to Farms: The Economic Benefits of Clearing Forests in Agricultural Settlements in the Amazon," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(2), pages 427-455, October.
    6. Mingjie Shi & Hongqi Wu & Xin Fan & Hongtao Jia & Tong Dong & Panxing He & Muhammad Fahad Baqa & Pingan Jiang, 2021. "Trade-Offs and Synergies of Multiple Ecosystem Services for Different Land Use Scenarios in the Yili River Valley, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Katarzyna A. Koryś & Agnieszka E. Latawiec & Maiara S. Mendes & Jerônimo B. B. Sansevero & Aline F. Rodrigues & Alvaro S. Iribarrem & Viviane Dib & Catarina C. Jakovac & Adriana Allek & Ingrid A. B. P, 2021. "Early Response of Soil Properties under Different Restoration Strategies in Tropical Hotspot," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:447:y:2007:i:7147:d:10.1038_nature05900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.