IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v9y2025i5d10.1038_s41562-025-02121-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General anaesthesia decreases the uniqueness of brain functional connectivity across individuals and species

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea I. Luppi

    (McGill University
    University of Cambridge)

  • Daniel Golkowski

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Andreas Ranft

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Rudiger Ilg

    (Technical University of Munich
    Department of Neurology)

  • Denis Jordan

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Danilo Bzdok

    (McGill University
    Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute)

  • Adrian M. Owen

    (Western University)

  • Lorina Naci

    (Trinity College Dublin)

  • Emmanuel A. Stamatakis

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Enrico Amico

    (University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham
    University of Birmingham)

  • Bratislav Misic

    (McGill University)

Abstract

The human brain is characterized by idiosyncratic patterns of spontaneous thought, rendering each brain uniquely identifiable from its neural activity. However, deep general anaesthesia suppresses subjective experience. Does it also suppress what makes each brain unique? Here we used functional MRI scans acquired under the effects of the general anaesthetics sevoflurane and propofol to determine whether anaesthetic-induced unconsciousness diminishes the uniqueness of the human brain, both with respect to the brains of other individuals and the brains of another species. Using functional connectivity, we report that under anaesthesia individual brains become less self-similar and less distinguishable from each other. Loss of distinctiveness is highly organized: it co-localizes with the archetypal sensory–association axis, correlating with genetic and morphometric markers of phylogenetic differences between humans and other primates. This effect is more evident at greater anaesthetic depths, reproducible across sevoflurane and propofol and reversed upon recovery. Providing convergent evidence, we show that anaesthesia shifts the functional connectivity of the human brain closer to the functional connectivity of the macaque brain in a low-dimensional space. Finally, anaesthesia diminishes the match between spontaneous brain activity and cognitive brain patterns aggregated from the Neurosynth meta-analytic engine. Collectively, the present results reveal that anaesthetized human brains are not only less distinguishable from each other, but also less distinguishable from the brains of other primates, with specifically human-expanded regions being the most affected by anaesthesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea I. Luppi & Daniel Golkowski & Andreas Ranft & Rudiger Ilg & Denis Jordan & Danilo Bzdok & Adrian M. Owen & Lorina Naci & Emmanuel A. Stamatakis & Enrico Amico & Bratislav Misic, 2025. "General anaesthesia decreases the uniqueness of brain functional connectivity across individuals and species," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(5), pages 987-1004, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02121-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02121-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02121-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-025-02121-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02121-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.