IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-63795-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial attention selectively alters visual cortical representation during target anticipation

Author

Listed:
  • Ekin Tünçok

    (New York University)

  • Marisa Carrasco

    (New York University
    New York University)

  • Jonathan Winawer

    (New York University
    New York University)

Abstract

Attention enables us to efficiently and flexibly interact with the environment by prioritizing specific image locations and features in preparation for responding to stimuli. Using a concurrent psychophysics–fMRI experiment, we investigate how covert spatial attention modulates responses in human visual cortex before target onset and how it affects subsequent behavioral performance. Performance improves at cued locations and worsens at uncued locations compared to distributed attention, demonstrating a selective processing tradeoff. Pre-target BOLD responses in cortical visual field maps reveal two key changes: First, a stimulus-independent baseline shift, with increases near cued locations and decreases elsewhere, paralleling behavioral results. Second, a shift in population receptive field centers toward the attended location. Both effects increase in higher visual areas. Together, these findings reveal that spatial attention has large effects on visual cortex prior to target appearance, altering neural response properties across multiple visual field maps and enhancing performance through anticipatory mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekin Tünçok & Marisa Carrasco & Jonathan Winawer, 2025. "Spatial attention selectively alters visual cortical representation during target anticipation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63795-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63795-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63795-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-63795-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc M. Himmelberg & Ekin Tünçok & Jesse Gomez & Kalanit Grill-Spector & Marisa Carrasco & Jonathan Winawer, 2023. "Comparing retinotopic maps of children and adults reveals a late-stage change in how V1 samples the visual field," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Adam C. Snyder & Byron M. Yu & Matthew A. Smith, 2018. "Distinct population codes for attention in the absence and presence of visual stimulation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Stefan Treue & Julio C. Martínez Trujillo, 1999. "Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6736), pages 575-579, June.
    4. Sonia Poltoratski & Kendrick Kay & Dawn Finzi & Kalanit Grill-Spector, 2021. "Holistic face recognition is an emergent phenomenon of spatial processing in face-selective regions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Marc M. Himmelberg & Jonathan Winawer & Marisa Carrasco, 2022. "Linking individual differences in human primary visual cortex to contrast sensitivity around the visual field," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Ilona M. Bloem & Sam Ling, 2019. "Normalization governs attentional modulation within human visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Yevgeniy B. Sirotin & Aniruddha Das, 2009. "Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7228), pages 475-479, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zvi N. Roth & Kendrick Kay & Elisha P. Merriam, 2022. "Natural scene sampling reveals reliable coarse-scale orientation tuning in human V1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Reuben Rideaux & Paul M. Bays & William J. Harrison, 2025. "Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Edward A. B. Horrocks & Fabio R. Rodrigues & Aman B. Saleem, 2024. "Flexible neural population dynamics govern the speed and stability of sensory encoding in mouse visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Marcel Linka & Harun Karimpur & Benjamin Haas, 2025. "Protracted development of gaze behaviour," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(9), pages 1887-1897, September.
    5. Xindong Song & Yueqi Guo & Hongbo Li & Chenggang Chen & Jong Hoon Lee & Yang Zhang & Zachary Schmidt & Xiaoqin Wang, 2022. "Mesoscopic landscape of cortical functions revealed by through-skull wide-field optical imaging in marmoset monkeys," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Amna Asif, 2024. "Contrast and Size Dependent Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex: Evidence from Surround Suppression and Facilitation Dynamics," Frontiers in Computational Spatial Intelligence, 50sea, vol. 2(3), pages 104-113, July.
    7. Vladislav Kozyrev & Mohammad Reza Daliri & Philipp Schwedhelm & Stefan Treue, 2019. "Strategic deployment of feature-based attentional gain in primate visual cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-28, August.
    8. repec:plo:pcbi00:1003099 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Clinton S Haarlem & Redmond G O’Connell & Kevin J Mitchell & Andrew L Jackson, 2024. "The speed of sight: Individual variation in critical flicker fusion thresholds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Robert G. Alexander & Stephen L. Macknik & Susana Martinez-Conde, 2022. "What the Neuroscience and Psychology of Magic Reveal about Misinformation," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Xaq Pitkow & Haim Sompolinsky & Markus Meister, 2007. "A Neural Computation for Visual Acuity in the Presence of Eye Movements," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Rong J. B. Zhu & Xue-Xin Wei, 2023. "Unsupervised approach to decomposing neural tuning variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Eline R. Kupers & Insub Kim & Kalanit Grill-Spector, 2024. "Rethinking simultaneous suppression in visual cortex via compressive spatiotemporal population receptive fields," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Jeroen Brus & Joseph A. Heng & Valeriia Beliaeva & Fabian Gonzalez Pinto & Antonino Mario Cassarà & Esra Neufeld & Marcus Grueschow & Lukas Imbach & Rafael Polanía, 2024. "Causal phase-dependent control of non-spatial attention in human prefrontal cortex," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 743-757, April.
    15. Michael J. Wolff & Rosanne L. Rademaker, 2025. "Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Hannah C. Bennett & Qingguang Zhang & Yuan-ting Wu & Steffy B. Manjila & Uree Chon & Donghui Shin & Daniel J. Vanselow & Hyun-Jae Pi & Patrick J. Drew & Yongsoo Kim, 2024. "Aging drives cerebrovascular network remodeling and functional changes in the mouse brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    17. repec:plo:pcbi00:1003577 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Zvi N. Roth & Elisha P. Merriam, 2023. "Representations in human primary visual cortex drift over time," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. George Loewenstein & Zachary Wojtowicz, 2023. "The Economics of Attention," CESifo Working Paper Series 10712, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63795-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.