IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-60859-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Wolff

    (Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society)

  • Rosanne L. Rademaker

    (Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with the Max Planck Society)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Wolff & Rosanne L. Rademaker, 2025. "Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-8, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60859-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-60859-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60859-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-60859-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zvi N. Roth & Kendrick Kay & Elisha P. Merriam, 2022. "Natural scene sampling reveals reliable coarse-scale orientation tuning in human V1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. repec:plo:pbio00:3000625 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. William J. Harrison & Paul M. Bays & Reuben Rideaux, 2023. "Neural tuning instantiates prior expectations in the human visual system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Marc M. Himmelberg & Jonathan Winawer & Marisa Carrasco, 2022. "Linking individual differences in human primary visual cortex to contrast sensitivity around the visual field," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reuben Rideaux & Paul M. Bays & William J. Harrison, 2025. "Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-7, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reuben Rideaux & Paul M. Bays & William J. Harrison, 2025. "Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Zvi N. Roth & Kendrick Kay & Elisha P. Merriam, 2022. "Natural scene sampling reveals reliable coarse-scale orientation tuning in human V1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Clinton S Haarlem & Redmond G O’Connell & Kevin J Mitchell & Andrew L Jackson, 2024. "The speed of sight: Individual variation in critical flicker fusion thresholds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Zvi N. Roth & Elisha P. Merriam, 2023. "Representations in human primary visual cortex drift over time," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. William J. Harrison & Paul M. Bays & Reuben Rideaux, 2023. "Neural tuning instantiates prior expectations in the human visual system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-60859-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.