IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-57987-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bell inequality violation in gate-defined quantum dots

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Steinacker

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Tuomo Tanttu

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Wee Han Lim

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Nard Dumoulin Stuyck

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • MengKe Feng

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Santiago Serrano

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Ensar Vahapoglu

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Rocky Y. Su

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Jonathan Y. Huang

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Cameron Jones

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Kohei M. Itoh

    (Keio University)

  • Fay E. Hudson

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Christopher C. Escott

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Andrea Morello

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Andre Saraiva

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Chih Hwan Yang

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Andrew S. Dzurak

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

  • Arne Laucht

    (University of New South Wales
    Diraq Pty. Ltd.)

Abstract

Quantum computers leverage entanglement to achieve superior computational power. However, verifying that the entangled state does not follow the principle of local causality has proven difficult for spin qubits in gate-defined quantum dots, as it requires simultaneously high concurrence values and readout fidelities to break the classical bound imposed by Bell’s inequality. While low error rates for state preparation, control, and measurement have been independently demonstrated, a simultaneous demonstration remained challenging. We employ advanced protocols like heralded initialization and calibration via gate set tomography (GST), to push fidelities of the full 2-qubit gate set above 99%, including state preparation and measurement (SPAM). We demonstrate a 97.17% Bell state fidelity without correcting for readout errors and violate Bell’s inequality using direct parity readout with a Bell signal of S = 2.731. Our measurements exceed the classical limit even at 1.1 K or entanglement lifetimes of 100 μs. Violating Bell’s inequality in a silicon quantum dot qubit system is a key milestone, as it proves quantum entanglement, fundamental to achieving quantum advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Steinacker & Tuomo Tanttu & Wee Han Lim & Nard Dumoulin Stuyck & MengKe Feng & Santiago Serrano & Ensar Vahapoglu & Rocky Y. Su & Jonathan Y. Huang & Cameron Jones & Kohei M. Itoh & Fay E. Hudson, 2025. "Bell inequality violation in gate-defined quantum dots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57987-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57987-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57987-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-57987-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57987-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.