IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-48329-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed representations of prediction error signals across the cortical hierarchy are synergistic

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Gelens

    (University of Amsterdam
    University of Cambridge)

  • Juho Äijälä

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Louis Roberts

    (University of Cambridge
    University of London)

  • Misako Komatsu

    (RIKEN Brain Science Institute)

  • Cem Uran

    (Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society
    Radboud University Nijmegen)

  • Michael A. Jensen

    (Mayo Clinic)

  • Kai J. Miller

    (Mayo Clinic)

  • Robin A. A. Ince

    (University of Glasgow)

  • Max Garagnani

    (University of London
    Freie Universität Berlin)

  • Martin Vinck

    (Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society
    Radboud University Nijmegen)

  • Andres Canales-Johnson

    (University of Cambridge
    Universidad Católica del Maule)

Abstract

A relevant question concerning inter-areal communication in the cortex is whether these interactions are synergistic. Synergy refers to the complementary effect of multiple brain signals conveying more information than the sum of each isolated signal. Redundancy, on the other hand, refers to the common information shared between brain signals. Here, we dissociated cortical interactions encoding complementary information (synergy) from those sharing common information (redundancy) during prediction error (PE) processing. We analyzed auditory and frontal electrocorticography (ECoG) signals in five common awake marmosets performing two distinct auditory oddball tasks and investigated to what extent event-related potentials (ERP) and broadband (BB) dynamics encoded synergistic and redundant information about PE processing. The information conveyed by ERPs and BB signals was synergistic even at lower stages of the hierarchy in the auditory cortex and between auditory and frontal regions. Using a brain-constrained neural network, we simulated the synergy and redundancy observed in the experimental results and demonstrated that the emergence of synergy between auditory and frontal regions requires the presence of strong, long-distance, feedback, and feedforward connections. These results indicate that distributed representations of PE signals across the cortical hierarchy can be highly synergistic.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Gelens & Juho Äijälä & Louis Roberts & Misako Komatsu & Cem Uran & Michael A. Jensen & Kai J. Miller & Robin A. A. Ince & Max Garagnani & Martin Vinck & Andres Canales-Johnson, 2024. "Distributed representations of prediction error signals across the cortical hierarchy are synergistic," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-48329-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48329-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48329-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-48329-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivan Voitov & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2022. "Cortical feedback loops bind distributed representations of working memory," Nature, Nature, vol. 608(7922), pages 381-389, August.
    2. William McGill, 1954. "Multivariate information transmission," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(2), pages 97-116, June.
    3. Gloria G. Parras & Javier Nieto-Diego & Guillermo V. Carbajal & Catalina Valdés-Baizabal & Carles Escera & Manuel S. Malmierca, 2017. "Neurons along the auditory pathway exhibit a hierarchical organization of prediction error," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Nicholas A. Steinmetz & Peter Zatka-Haas & Matteo Carandini & Kenneth D. Harris, 2019. "Distributed coding of choice, action and engagement across the mouse brain," Nature, Nature, vol. 576(7786), pages 266-273, December.
    5. Aman B. Saleem & E. Mika Diamanti & Julien Fournier & Kenneth D. Harris & Matteo Carandini, 2018. "Coherent encoding of subjective spatial position in visual cortex and hippocampus," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7725), pages 124-127, October.
    6. Kai J. Miller, 2019. "A library of human electrocorticographic data and analyses," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(11), pages 1225-1235, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kotaro Ishizu & Shosuke Nishimoto & Yutaro Ueoka & Akihiro Funamizu, 2024. "Localized and global representation of prior value, sensory evidence, and choice in male mouse cerebral cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. repec:hig:wpaper:98sti2019 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Petersen, Alexander M. & Rotolo, Daniele & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2016. "A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 666-681.
    4. Park, Han Woo & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2010. "Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 640-649, June.
    5. Songyot Nakariyakul, 2019. "A hybrid gene selection algorithm based on interaction information for microarray-based cancer classification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Louis Verny & Nadir Sella & Séverine Affeldt & Param Priya Singh & Hervé Isambert, 2017. "Learning causal networks with latent variables from multivariate information in genomic data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Xiaojun Hu & Xian Li & Ronald Rousseau, 2021. "Mathematical reflections on Triple Helix calculations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8581-8587, October.
    8. Inga A. Ivanova & Loet Leydesdorff, 2014. "A simulation model of the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations and the decomposition of the redundancy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(3), pages 927-948, June.
    9. Loet Leydesdorff & Han Woo Park & Balazs Lengyel, 2014. "A routine for measuring synergy in university–industry–government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 27-35, April.
    10. Lengyel, Balázs & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2015. "The Effects of FDI on Innovation Systems in Hungarian Regions: Where is the Synergy Generated?," MPRA Paper 73945, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Han Woo Park, 2014. "Mapping election campaigns through negative entropy: Triple and Quadruple Helix approach to South Korea’s 2012 presidential election," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 187-197, April.
    12. Kenneth W. Latimer & David J. Freedman, 2023. "Low-dimensional encoding of decisions in parietal cortex reflects long-term training history," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Loet Leydesdorff & Igone Porto-Gomez, 2019. "Measuring the expected synergy in Spanish regional and national systems of innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 189-209, February.
    14. Strand, Øivind & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2013. "Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 471-484.
    15. Jérémie Sibille & Carolin Gehr & Jonathan I. Benichov & Hymavathy Balasubramanian & Kai Lun Teh & Tatiana Lupashina & Daniela Vallentin & Jens Kremkow, 2022. "High-density electrode recordings reveal strong and specific connections between retinal ganglion cells and midbrain neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Dennis Knepp & Doris Entwisle, 1969. "Testing significance of differences between two chi-squares," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(3), pages 331-333, September.
    17. Inga Ivanova & Oivind Strand & Loet Leydesdorff, 2019. "The Synergy and Cycle Values in Regional Innovation Systems: The Case of Norway," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 13(1), pages 48-61.
    18. Frank Huettner, & Tamer Boyaci, & Yalcin Akcay, 2016. "Consumer choice under limited attention when alternatives have different information costs," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-16-04_R2, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 28 Feb 2018.
    19. Drew C. Schreiner & Christian Cazares & Rafael Renteria & Christina M. Gremel, 2022. "Information normally considered task-irrelevant drives decision-making and affects premotor circuit recruitment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. João D. Semedo & Anna I. Jasper & Amin Zandvakili & Aravind Krishna & Amir Aschner & Christian K. Machens & Adam Kohn & Byron M. Yu, 2022. "Feedforward and feedback interactions between visual cortical areas use different population activity patterns," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    21. Márton Albert Hajnal & Duy Tran & Michael Einstein & Mauricio Vallejo Martelo & Karen Safaryan & Pierre-Olivier Polack & Peyman Golshani & Gergő Orbán, 2023. "Continuous multiplexed population representations of task context in the mouse primary visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-48329-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.