IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v608y2022i7922d10.1038_s41586-022-05014-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cortical feedback loops bind distributed representations of working memory

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Voitov

    (University College London
    University of Basel)

  • Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel

    (University College London)

Abstract

Working memory—the brain’s ability to internalize information and use it flexibly to guide behaviour—is an essential component of cognition. Although activity related to working memory has been observed in several brain regions1–3, how neural populations actually represent working memory4–7 and the mechanisms by which this activity is maintained8–12 remain unclear13–15. Here we describe the neural implementation of visual working memory in mice alternating between a delayed non-match-to-sample task and a simple discrimination task that does not require working memory but has identical stimulus, movement and reward statistics. Transient optogenetic inactivations revealed that distributed areas of the neocortex were required selectively for the maintenance of working memory. Population activity in visual area AM and premotor area M2 during the delay period was dominated by orderly low-dimensional dynamics16,17 that were, however, independent of working memory. Instead, working memory representations were embedded in high-dimensional population activity, present in both cortical areas, persisted throughout the inter-stimulus delay period, and predicted behavioural responses during the working memory task. To test whether the distributed nature of working memory was dependent on reciprocal interactions between cortical regions18–20, we silenced one cortical area (AM or M2) while recording the feedback it received from the other. Transient inactivation of either area led to the selective disruption of inter-areal communication of working memory. Therefore, reciprocally interconnected cortical areas maintain bound high-dimensional representations of working memory.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Voitov & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2022. "Cortical feedback loops bind distributed representations of working memory," Nature, Nature, vol. 608(7922), pages 381-389, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:608:y:2022:i:7922:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05014-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05014-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05014-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-022-05014-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan, Guoyong & Liu, Pengwei & Shi, Jifang & Wang, Guangrui, 2023. "Dynamics and control of spiral waves under feedback derived from a moving measuring point," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Huee Ru Chong & Yadollah Ranjbar-Slamloo & Malcolm Zheng Hao Ho & Xuan Ouyang & Tsukasa Kamigaki, 2023. "Functional alterations of the prefrontal circuit underlying cognitive aging in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Xin Wei Chia & Jian Kwang Tan & Lee Fang Ang & Tsukasa Kamigaki & Hiroshi Makino, 2023. "Emergence of cortical network motifs for short-term memory during learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:608:y:2022:i:7922:d:10.1038_s41586-022-05014-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.