IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-38033-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness and innovation in synthetic genotype networks

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Santos-Moreno

    (University of Lausanne
    Pompeu Fabra University)

  • Eve Tasiudi

    (ETH Zurich and SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics)

  • Hadiastri Kusumawardhani

    (University of Lausanne)

  • Joerg Stelling

    (ETH Zurich and SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics)

  • Yolanda Schaerli

    (University of Lausanne)

Abstract

Genotype networks are sets of genotypes connected by small mutational changes that share the same phenotype. They facilitate evolutionary innovation by enabling the exploration of different neighborhoods in genotype space. Genotype networks, first suggested by theoretical models, have been empirically confirmed for proteins and RNAs. Comparative studies also support their existence for gene regulatory networks (GRNs), but direct experimental evidence is lacking. Here, we report the construction of three interconnected genotype networks of synthetic GRNs producing three distinct phenotypes in Escherichia coli. Our synthetic GRNs contain three nodes regulating each other by CRISPR interference and governing the expression of fluorescent reporters. The genotype networks, composed of over twenty different synthetic GRNs, provide robustness in face of mutations while enabling transitions to innovative phenotypes. Through realistic mathematical modeling, we quantify robustness and evolvability for the complete genotype-phenotype map and link these features mechanistically to GRN motifs. Our work thereby exemplifies how GRN evolution along genotype networks might be driving evolutionary innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Santos-Moreno & Eve Tasiudi & Hadiastri Kusumawardhani & Joerg Stelling & Yolanda Schaerli, 2023. "Robustness and innovation in synthetic genotype networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-38033-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38033-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-38033-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-38033-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo B. R. Azevedo & Rolf Lohaus & Suraj Srinivasan & Kristen K. Dang & Christina L. Burch, 2006. "Erratum: Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7111), pages 598-598, October.
    2. Ricardo B. R. Azevedo & Rolf Lohaus & Suraj Srinivasan & Kristen K. Dang & Christina L. Burch, 2006. "Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7080), pages 87-90, March.
    3. Amin Espah Borujeni & Jing Zhang & Hamid Doosthosseini & Alec A. K. Nielsen & Christopher A. Voigt, 2020. "Genetic circuit characterization by inferring RNA polymerase movement and ribosome usage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Annie E. Tsong & Brian B. Tuch & Hao Li & Alexander D. Johnson, 2006. "Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic," Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7110), pages 415-420, September.
    5. Dave W. Anderson & Florian Baier & Gloria Yang & Nobuhiko Tokuriki, 2021. "The adaptive landscape of a metallo-enzyme is shaped by environment-dependent epistasis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Mark Isalan & Caroline Lemerle & Konstantinos Michalodimitrakis & Carsten Horn & Pedro Beltrao & Emanuele Raineri & Mireia Garriga-Canut & Luis Serrano, 2008. "Evolvability and hierarchy in rewired bacterial gene networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7189), pages 840-845, April.
    7. Trevor R. Sorrells & Lauren N. Booth & Brian B. Tuch & Alexander D. Johnson, 2015. "Intersecting transcription networks constrain gene regulatory evolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 523(7560), pages 361-365, July.
    8. Stefano Ciliberti & Olivier C Martin & Andreas Wagner, 2007. "Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, February.
    9. Javier Santos-Moreno & Eve Tasiudi & Joerg Stelling & Yolanda Schaerli, 2020. "Multistable and dynamic CRISPRi-based synthetic circuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Michael B. Elowitz & Stanislas Leibler, 2000. "A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6767), pages 335-338, January.
    11. Eric J. Hayden & Evandro Ferrada & Andreas Wagner, 2011. "Cryptic genetic variation promotes rapid evolutionary adaptation in an RNA enzyme," Nature, Nature, vol. 474(7349), pages 92-95, June.
    12. Tamar Friedlander & Roshan Prizak & Nicholas H. Barton & Gašper Tkačik, 2017. "Evolution of new regulatory functions on biophysically realistic fitness landscapes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Aaron M. New & Ben Lehner, 2019. "Harmonious genetic combinations rewire regulatory networks and flip gene essentiality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Payne, Joshua L., 2016. "No tradeoff between versatility and robustness in gene circuit motifs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 449(C), pages 192-199.
    2. Sam F Greenbury & Steffen Schaper & Sebastian E Ahnert & Ard A Louis, 2016. "Genetic Correlations Greatly Increase Mutational Robustness and Can Both Reduce and Enhance Evolvability," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Nasimul Noman & Taku Monjo & Pablo Moscato & Hitoshi Iba, 2015. "Evolving Robust Gene Regulatory Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Stefano Ciliberti & Olivier C Martin & Andreas Wagner, 2007. "Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Krishnan, Arun & Tomita, Masaru & Giuliani, Alessandro, 2008. "Evolution of gene regulatory networks: Robustness as an emergent property of evolution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(8), pages 2170-2186.
    6. Shintaro Nagata & Macoto Kikuchi, 2020. "Emergence of cooperative bistability and robustness of gene regulatory networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Tadamune Kaneko & Macoto Kikuchi, 2022. "Evolution enhances mutational robustness and suppresses the emergence of a new phenotype: A new computational approach for studying evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Jin Wang & Bo Huang & Xuefeng Xia & Zhirong Sun, 2006. "Funneled Landscape Leads to Robustness of Cell Networks: Yeast Cell Cycle," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-10, November.
    9. Avraham E Mayo & Yaakov Setty & Seagull Shavit & Alon Zaslaver & Uri Alon, 2006. "Plasticity of the cis-Regulatory Input Function of a Gene," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-1, March.
    10. Ankit Gupta & Mustafa Khammash, 2022. "Frequency spectra and the color of cellular noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Bottani, Samuel & Grammaticos, Basile, 2008. "A simple model of genetic oscillations through regulated degradation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 1468-1482.
    12. Margherita Carletti & Malay Banerjee, 2019. "A Backward Technique for Demographic Noise in Biological Ordinary Differential Equation Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Weiyue Ji & Handuo Shi & Haoqian Zhang & Rui Sun & Jingyi Xi & Dingqiao Wen & Jingchen Feng & Yiwei Chen & Xiao Qin & Yanrong Ma & Wenhan Luo & Linna Deng & Hanchi Lin & Ruofan Yu & Qi Ouyang, 2013. "A Formalized Design Process for Bacterial Consortia That Perform Logic Computing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    14. Konstantinos I Papadimitriou & Guy-Bart V Stan & Emmanuel M Drakakis, 2013. "Systematic Computation of Nonlinear Cellular and Molecular Dynamics with Low-Power CytoMimetic Circuits: A Simulation Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Anthony V Furano & Charlie E Jones & Vipul Periwal & Kathryn E Callahan & Jean-Claude Walser & Pamela R Cook, 2020. "Cryptic genetic variation enhances primate L1 retrotransposon survival by enlarging the functional coiled coil sequence space of ORF1p," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Inés P Mariño & Alexey Zaikin & Joaquín Míguez, 2017. "A comparison of Monte Carlo-based Bayesian parameter estimation methods for stochastic models of genetic networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, August.
    17. Zhdanov, Vladimir P., 2012. "Periodic perturbation of genetic oscillations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 577-587.
    18. Dhiman, Aman & Poria, Swarup, 2018. "Allee effect induced diversity in evolutionary dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 32-38.
    19. Manuel Beltrán Del Río & Christopher R. Stephens & David A. Rosenblueth, 2015. "Fitness Landscape Epistasis And Recombination," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(07n08), pages 1-38, November.
    20. William M. Shaw & Lucie Studená & Kyler Roy & Piotr Hapeta & Nicholas S. McCarty & Alicia E. Graham & Tom Ellis & Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro, 2022. "Inducible expression of large gRNA arrays for multiplexed CRISPRai applications," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-38033-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.