IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-27069-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Listeria monocytogenes faecal carriage is common and depends on the gut microbiota

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Hafner

    (Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Inserm U1117, Biology of Infection Unit)

  • Maxime Pichon

    (University Hospital of Poitiers, Infectious Agents Department, Bacteriology and Infection Control Laboratory
    Université de Poitiers, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie
    Université de Poitiers, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie)

  • Christophe Burucoa

    (University Hospital of Poitiers, Infectious Agents Department, Bacteriology and Infection Control Laboratory
    Université de Poitiers, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie
    Université de Poitiers, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie)

  • Sophie H. A. Nusser

    (Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Inserm U1117, Biology of Infection Unit)

  • Alexandra Moura

    (Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Inserm U1117, Biology of Infection Unit
    Institut Pasteur, National Reference Center and WHO Collaborating Center Listeria)

  • Marc Garcia-Garcera

    (University of Lausanne, Department of Fundamental Microbiology)

  • Marc Lecuit

    (Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Inserm U1117, Biology of Infection Unit
    Institut Pasteur, National Reference Center and WHO Collaborating Center Listeria
    Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, APHP, Institut Imagine)

Abstract

Listeria genus comprises two pathogenic species, L. monocytogenes (Lm) and L. ivanovii, and non-pathogenic species. All can thrive as saprophytes, whereas only pathogenic species cause systemic infections. Identifying Listeria species’ respective biotopes is critical to understand the ecological contribution of Listeria virulence. In order to investigate the prevalence and abundance of Listeria species in various sources, we retrieved and analyzed 16S rRNA datasets from MG-RAST metagenomic database. 26% of datasets contain Listeria sensu stricto sequences, and Lm is the most prevalent species, most abundant in soil and host-associated environments, including 5% of human stools. Lm is also detected in 10% of human stool samples from an independent cohort of 900 healthy asymptomatic donors. A specific microbiota signature is associated with Lm faecal carriage, both in humans and experimentally inoculated mice, in which it precedes Lm faecal carriage. These results indicate that Lm faecal carriage is common and depends on the gut microbiota, and suggest that Lm faecal carriage is a crucial yet overlooked consequence of its virulence.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Hafner & Maxime Pichon & Christophe Burucoa & Sophie H. A. Nusser & Alexandra Moura & Marc Garcia-Garcera & Marc Lecuit, 2021. "Listeria monocytogenes faecal carriage is common and depends on the gut microbiota," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-27069-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27069-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27069-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-27069-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alejandro Toledo-Arana & Olivier Dussurget & Georgios Nikitas & Nina Sesto & Hélène Guet-Revillet & Damien Balestrino & Edmund Loh & Jonas Gripenland & Teresa Tiensuu & Karolis Vaitkevicius & Mathieu , 2009. "The Listeria transcriptional landscape from saprophytism to virulence," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7249), pages 950-956, June.
    2. Marc Garcia-Garcera & Eduardo P. C. Rocha, 2020. "Community diversity and habitat structure shape the repertoire of extracellular proteins in bacteria," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Mylène M. Maury & Hélène Bracq-Dieye & Lei Huang & Guillaume Vales & Morgane Lavina & Pierre Thouvenot & Olivier Disson & Alexandre Leclercq & Sylvain Brisse & Marc Lecuit, 2019. "Hypervirulent Listeria monocytogenes clones’ adaption to mammalian gut accounts for their association with dairy products," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Amir Zarrinpar & Amandine Chaix & Zhenjiang Z. Xu & Max W. Chang & Clarisse A. Marotz & Alan Saghatelian & Rob Knight & Satchidananda Panda, 2018. "Antibiotic-induced microbiome depletion alters metabolic homeostasis by affecting gut signaling and colonic metabolism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Jessica Gurevitch & Julia Koricheva & Shinichi Nakagawa & Gavin Stewart, 2018. "Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis," Nature, Nature, vol. 555(7695), pages 175-182, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    2. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Irsova, Zuzana & Doucouliagos, Hristos & Havranek, Tomas & Stanley, T. D., 2023. "Meta-Analysis of Social Science Research: A Practitioner’s Guide," EconStor Preprints 273719, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Kulinskaya, Elena & Mah, Eung Yaw, 2021. "Simulation results on the performance of statistical methods in cumulative meta analysis," MetaArXiv 8t4pf, Center for Open Science.
    5. Christopher Hansen & Holger Steinmetz & Jörn Block, 2022. "How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Denis Fougère & Arthur Heim, 2019. "L'évaluation socioéconomique de l'investissement social," Working Papers hal-03456048, HAL.
    7. In-Soo Shin & Juh-Hyun Shin & Dong-Eun Jang & Jiyeon Lee, 2022. "A Methodological Quality Evaluation of Meta-Analyses on Nursing Home Research: Overview and Suggestions for Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Fabio De Felice & Ilaria Baffo & Antonella Petrillo, 2022. "Critical Infrastructures Overview: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Na Wang & Debra K. Creedy & Mingna Zhang & Hong Lu & Elizabeth Elder & Jyai Allen & Li Guo & Qian Xiao & Jenny Gamble, 2022. "Designing a Needs-Oriented Psychological Intervention for Chinese Women Undergoing an Abortion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Subroy, Vandana & Gunawardena, Asha & Polyakov, Maksym & Pandit, Ram & Pannell, David J., 2019. "The worth of wildlife: A meta-analysis of global non-market values of threatened species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Wenqiang Xie & Xiaodong Yan, 2023. "Responses of Wheat Protein Content and Protein Yield to Future Climate Change in China during 2041–2060," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Antonino Malacrinò & Victoria A Sadowski & Tvisha K Martin & Nathalia Cavichiolli de Oliveira & Ian J Brackett & James D Feller & Kristian J Harris & Orlando Combita Heredia & Rosa Vescio & Alison E B, 2020. "Biological invasions alter environmental microbiomes: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.
    13. Fahui Jiang & Shangshu Huang & Yan Wu & Mahbub Ul Islam & Fangjin Dong & Zhen Cao & Guohui Chen & Yuming Guo, 2022. "A Large-Scale Dataset of Conservation and Deep Tillage in Mollisols, Northeast Plain, China," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Fátima L. Vieira & Paulo A. Vieira & Denis A. Coelho, 2019. "A Data-Driven Approach to Development of a Taxonomy Framework for Triple Bottom Line Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Junwen Zhu & Weishu Liu, 2020. "A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 321-335, April.
    17. Ismagilova, Elvira & Slade, Emma & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2020. "The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    18. Lifeng Lin, 2018. "Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Shannon G. Klein & Cassandra Roch & Carlos M. Duarte, 2024. "Systematic review of the uncertainty of coral reef futures under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Udaya M Kabadi, 2018. "Present Medical Research: Is it Really Original Research Anymore?," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 10(5), pages 8080-8082, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-27069-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.