IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v555y2018i7695d10.1038_nature25753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Gurevitch

    (Stony Brook University)

  • Julia Koricheva

    (School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London)

  • Shinichi Nakagawa

    (Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales
    Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst)

  • Gavin Stewart

    (School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University)

Abstract

Meta-analysis is the quantitative, scientific synthesis of research results. Since the term and modern approaches to research synthesis were first introduced in the 1970s, meta-analysis has had a revolutionary effect in many scientific fields, helping to establish evidence-based practice and to resolve seemingly contradictory research outcomes. At the same time, its implementation has engendered criticism and controversy, in some cases general and others specific to particular disciplines. Here we take the opportunity provided by the recent fortieth anniversary of meta-analysis to reflect on the accomplishments, limitations, recent advances and directions for future developments in the field of research synthesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Gurevitch & Julia Koricheva & Shinichi Nakagawa & Gavin Stewart, 2018. "Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis," Nature, Nature, vol. 555(7695), pages 175-182, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:555:y:2018:i:7695:d:10.1038_nature25753
    DOI: 10.1038/nature25753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25753
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature25753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:555:y:2018:i:7695:d:10.1038_nature25753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.