IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v11y2020i1d10.1038_s41467-020-18008-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A machine learning Automated Recommendation Tool for synthetic biology

Author

Listed:
  • Tijana Radivojević

    (DOE Agile BioFoundry
    DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

  • Zak Costello

    (DOE Agile BioFoundry
    DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

  • Kenneth Workman

    (DOE Agile BioFoundry
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    University of California)

  • Hector Garcia Martin

    (DOE Agile BioFoundry
    DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    BCAM, Basque Center for Applied Mathematics)

Abstract

Synthetic biology allows us to bioengineer cells to synthesize novel valuable molecules such as renewable biofuels or anticancer drugs. However, traditional synthetic biology approaches involve ad-hoc engineering practices, which lead to long development times. Here, we present the Automated Recommendation Tool (ART), a tool that leverages machine learning and probabilistic modeling techniques to guide synthetic biology in a systematic fashion, without the need for a full mechanistic understanding of the biological system. Using sampling-based optimization, ART provides a set of recommended strains to be built in the next engineering cycle, alongside probabilistic predictions of their production levels. We demonstrate the capabilities of ART on simulated data sets, as well as experimental data from real metabolic engineering projects producing renewable biofuels, hoppy flavored beer without hops, fatty acids, and tryptophan. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this approach, and the practical consequences of the underlying assumptions failing.

Suggested Citation

  • Tijana Radivojević & Zak Costello & Kenneth Workman & Hector Garcia Martin, 2020. "A machine learning Automated Recommendation Tool for synthetic biology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-18008-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18008-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18008-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-020-18008-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Gogleva & Dimitris Polychronopoulos & Matthias Pfeifer & Vladimir Poroshin & Michaël Ughetto & Matthew J. Martin & Hannah Thorpe & Aurelie Bornot & Paul D. Smith & Ben Sidders & Jonathan R. Dry &, 2022. "Knowledge graph-based recommendation framework identifies drivers of resistance in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Amir Pandi & Christoph Diehl & Ali Yazdizadeh Kharrazi & Scott A. Scholz & Elizaveta Bobkova & Léon Faure & Maren Nattermann & David Adam & Nils Chapin & Yeganeh Foroughijabbari & Charles Moritz & Nic, 2022. "A versatile active learning workflow for optimization of genetic and metabolic networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Katharina Paulick & Simon Seidel & Christoph Lange & Annina Kemmer & Mariano Nicolas Cruz-Bournazou & André Baier & Daniel Haehn, 2022. "Promoting Sustainability through Next-Generation Biologics Drug Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-31, April.
    4. Wang, Zhengxin & Peng, Xinggan & Xia, Ao & Shah, Akeel A. & Yan, Huchao & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xianqing & Zhu, Xun & Liao, Qiang, 2023. "Comparison of machine learning methods for predicting the methane production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-18008-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.