IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mve/journl/v36y2010i1p29-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Product Reliability Management for a Firm with a Complacent Competitor vs. a Lockstep Competitor

Author

Listed:
  • Jannett Highfill

    (Bradley University)

  • Michael McAsey

    (Bradley University)

Abstract

Consider a dynamic duopoly model where R&D spending is used to increase the reliability of a firm's product under two competitive scenarios: the home firm competes with a "complacent" foreign firm that does no R&D whatsoever or with a "lockstep" foreign firm that improves its product at exactly the same rate as the home firm. The paper suggests that a firm with a complacent competitor produces a more reliable product, does more R&D, and earns more profit than a firm with a lockstep competitor. On the other hand, sufficiently less R&D spending is required that profits per R&D dollar are greater in the lockstep scenario. Extensions of the basic model include changes in the planning period, introducing trade costs, and considering intermediate competitive scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Jannett Highfill & Michael McAsey, 2010. "Dynamic Product Reliability Management for a Firm with a Complacent Competitor vs. a Lockstep Competitor," Journal of Economic Insight, Missouri Valley Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 29-54.
    • Handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:36:y:2010:i:1:p:29-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Highfill Jannett & McAsey Michael, 2011. "Will Technological Progress Cure the "Advanced Technology Products" Trade Account Deficit?," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Jannett Highfill & Michael McAsey, 2013. "Welfare Measures in Dynamic Firm R&D Games," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 19(4), pages 439-449, November.
    3. repec:kap:iaecre:v:16:y:2010:i:3:p:243-256 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jannett Highfill & Michael McAsey, 2010. "Firm Metrics with Continuous R&D, Quality Improvement, and Cournot Quantities," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 16(3), pages 243-256, August.
    5. Jannett Highfill & Michael McAsey, 2013. "Dynamic Firm R&D Games: Manufacturing Costs and Reliability Paths," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 3, pages 1-14, February.
    6. Jannett Highfill & Michael McAsey, 2018. "Product Reliability, R&D, and Manufacturing Cost Shocks," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 46(1), pages 27-42, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D92 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Intertemporal Firm Choice, Investment, Capacity, and Financing
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mve:journl:v:36:y:2010:i:1:p:29-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ken Brown (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mveaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.