IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Quota dei profitti e redditività del capitale in Italia: un tentativo di interpretazione

  • Torrini Roberto

Profit share in Italy has been growing between the mid '70s and the mid '90s, remaining stable at historically high levels since than. After the drop of the first half of the seventies, originated by an unprecedented rapid rise of wages, profit share started to recover. The rise of the '80s, that involved the entire business sector, was part of this recovery process. During the '90s, profit share continued to grow on average, but with large cross-sector differences. Profit share in manufacturing, more exposed to international competition, declined together with the returns on capital stock, but increased in the rest of the business sector. We show that the better performance of the non-manufacturing business sector is mainly due to those industries more affected by the large-scale privatisations and restructuring of State owned companies, started in the first half of the '90s. They granted a rapid growth of total factor productivity and a deceleration of wage dynamics, without a major impact on market power of privatised companies. Our evidence is thus supportive of the hypothesis that profit share growth during the '90s, observed also in other countries, was mainly due to rents redistribution, instead of to biased technological change.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Società editrice il Mulino in its journal Politica economica.

Volume (Year): (2005)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 7-42

in new window

Handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/19576:y:2005:i:1:p:7-42
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/19576:y:2005:i:1:p:7-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.