IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jpag88/v9y2019i1p219-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nigerian Public Officers Protection Act: An Anachronistic Legislation Yearning for Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Abiodun Odusote

Abstract

Tanzania is implementing the decentralization by devolution policy (D by D) as a mechanism of facilitating quick development process through the involvement of people from grass root levels. One of the areas for decentralization is administrative decentralization whereby local government authorities are regarded as autonomous organs when it comes to management of human resources from hiring to firing. However, recently from 2009, the government decided to establish a new centralized recruitment system, which recruits and allocates human resources on behalf of local government authorities and other government institutions. Several reasons have been advocated in favour of these changes like to facilitate uniformity and lack of meritocracy by the local government authorities. Using secondary data, this paper attempts to show how the establishment of centralized recruitment in Tanzania has acted as a thorn towards the full attainment of administrative decentralization. The paper ends by concluding that centralized recruitment has not only weakened local authorities in implementing D by D policy but it has left a lacuna in the real meaning of D by D policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Abiodun Odusote, 2019. "The Nigerian Public Officers Protection Act: An Anachronistic Legislation Yearning for Reforms," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 219-235, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jpag88:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:219-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jpag/article/view/14404/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jpag/article/view/14404
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    limitation period; pre-action notice; dual protection; immunity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jpag88:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:219-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jpag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.