IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijld88/v2y2012i1p593-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of the Selected Administrative Practices at Public and Private Sector Universities of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Bibi Asia Naz
  • Umar Ali Khan
  • Rahmat Ullah Shah
  • Javed Iqbal

Abstract

The study aims to compare the administrative practices of public and private sector universities of Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa and Punjab. The researcher randomly selected 160 academicians and 160 administrators from two public and two private universities of each province Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa and Punjab. The data was collected through a questionnaire consisted of 32 domains. The main findings of the study are-? There is no significant difference between the opinions of academicians and administrators of public and private sector universities about the amendments in the act/statute,? the HEC influence in Administrative matters, the members selection of different bodies,? tenure of different bodies, the decision making practice,? the staff selection. While significant difference was found between the opinions of academicians and administrators of public and private sector universities about the procedure for irregularities. It is evident that there is lack of a proper procedure for dealing with irregularities in both sector universities.?Key Words- Administrative Practices, Academicians, Administrators, Universities.?

Suggested Citation

  • Bibi Asia Naz & Umar Ali Khan & Rahmat Ullah Shah & Javed Iqbal, 2012. "A Comparative Study of the Selected Administrative Practices at Public and Private Sector Universities of Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 593-602, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijld88:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:593-602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld/article/download/1521/1232
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld/article/view/1521
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijld88:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:593-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.