IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ijld88/v2y2012i1p48-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approaches to Composition Writing: The Case of Junior Secondary Schools in Botswana

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Adeninhun Adeyemi

Abstract

This investigation aims at identifying the approaches teachers in junior secondary schools utilize in the teaching of English composition writing and assesses how far the approaches impact students¡¯ development of effective writing skills. It also discusses the challenges/advantages posed by the use of such approaches in writing pedagogy. The study utilizes the qualitative technique through interviews, observations, literature reviews, examination of documents and students¡¯ artifacts. Based on the methodologies employed, the major findings are that teachers mainly used the product oriented approach to teaching composition writing. As a result of the approach, the teachers were confronted with students¡¯ inability to write in any meaningful way as a result of surface level errors, lack of ideas/vocabulary, lack of organization skills and students¡¯ inability to compose effectively among other problems. On the part of students, they were found to have poor writing skills reflected in their inability to compose, lack of ideas and vocabulary and general apathy to composition writing which is a disadvantage if students are to become effective communicators in an increasingly globalized world. Key Words- Product writing, process writing, reading/writing connection, modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Adeninhun Adeyemi, 2012. "Approaches to Composition Writing: The Case of Junior Secondary Schools in Botswana," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 48-63, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ijld88:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:48-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld/article/download/1218/995
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld/article/view/1218
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ijld88:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:48-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.