IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ieb888/v9y2023i1p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review on the Green Sukuk after Paris-Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Soud Almutairi

Abstract

This paper aims to identify, critically evaluate, and synthesize extant literature on Islamic green bonds. This study also identifies gaps and limitations in green Sukuk literature to highlight areas for further development of knowledge in this field of study. The study utilized a scoping review to identify all relevant literature from the EBSCO Host, Emerald, and Google Scholar databases. Our findings suggest that the concept of green sukuk is still emergent, and there are several gaps regarding the technical definitions and green taxonomy that need to be addressed. In addition, we discovered that there is a significant demand for sustainable investments, and the potential for liquid Islamic economies to supply this demand makes green sukuk an attractive investment option. Furthermore, the limitations of conventional green bonds in attracting Islamic investment further support the development of green sukuk. However, we also identified factors that hinder the development of green sukuk. The emergent nature of the concept and the lack of consistent green taxonomy for sukuk create a lack of understanding and hinder the development of effective legal frameworks. To overcome these challenges, we recommend that academics and Islamic scholars work towards developing a clear green taxonomy for sukuk. Such a taxonomy would help regulators develop a stronger legal framework for green sukuk and facilitate the growth of the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Soud Almutairi, 2023. "A Systematic Review on the Green Sukuk after Paris-Agreement," Issues in Economics and Business, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 1-1, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ieb888:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ieb/article/download/21110/16329
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ieb/article/view/21110
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ieb888:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ieb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.