IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr16_05_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Localization Measures and International Economic Law:How Do WTO and TPP/CPTPP Disciplines Apply to These Measures?

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshinori Abe

    (Professor, Faculty of Law, Gakushuin University)

Abstract

Remarkable development of the data economy and growing awareness of the importance of data in recent years have driven some countries to strengthen their control over data flow. Measures restricting cross-border data transfer or requiring data to be stored within national borders, such as China’s 2017 Cybersecurity Law, are known as data localization measures. This article argues that these data localization measures may constitute a breach of the market access commitment or the national treatment commitment under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), while there is a fair possibility that these measures are justified under GATS general or security exceptions. It also shows that the E-Commerce Chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership / Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP/CPTPP) is applicable to cross-border data transfer by companies in non-service sectors as well and contains specific provisions concerning cross-border data transfer and location of computing facilities. This means that the TPP/CPTPP established clearer rules than the GATS with respect to data localization measures. However, as the TPP/CPTPP E-Commerce Chapter has specific exceptions for measures implemented to achieve a legitimate public policy objective, such exceptions could provide broad justification for data localization measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshinori Abe, 2020. "Data Localization Measures and International Economic Law:How Do WTO and TPP/CPTPP Disciplines Apply to These Measures?," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 16(5), pages 1-29, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr16_05_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr16_05_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yakovleva, Svetlana, 2018. "Should Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection be a Part of the EU's International Trade ‘Deals’?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 477-508, July.
    2. Aaditya Mattoo & Joshua P Meltzer, 2018. "International Data Flows and Privacy: The Conflict and Its Resolution," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 769-789.
    3. Nivedita Sen, 2018. "Understanding the Role of the WTO in International Data Flows: Taking the Liberalization or the Regulatory Autonomy Path?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 323-348.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Pomfret, 2020. "Global Production Networks, New Trade Technologies and the Challenge for International Institutions," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(1), pages 21-41, February.
    2. Ferracane,Martina Francesca & Van Der Marel,Erik Leendert, 2021. "Regulating Personal Data : Data Models and Digital Services Trade," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9596, The World Bank.
    3. Kyvik Nordås, Hildegunn, 2023. "Services in the India-EU Free Trade Agreement," Working Papers 2023:5, Örebro University, School of Business.
    4. Manfred Elsig & Sebastian Klotz, 2021. "Digital Trade Rules in Preferential Trade Agreements: Is There a WTO Impact?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 25-36, May.
    5. Erik Marel & Martina Francesca Ferracane, 2021. "Do data policy restrictions inhibit trade in services?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 157(4), pages 727-776, November.
    6. Bernard Hoekman & Martina Ferracane & Erik van der Marel van der Marel, 2023. "Digital Trade, Data Protection and EU Adequacy Decisions," RSCAS Working Papers 2023/37, European University Institute.
    7. Lijuan Yang, 2023. "Recommendations for metaverse governance based on technical standards," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Slok-Wodkowska Magdalena & Mazur Joanna, 2021. "The EU's regional trade agreements: How the EU addresses challenges related to digital transformation," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 57(2), pages 105-120, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr16_05_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.