IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/bcwpap/v8y2018i1p103-132.html

DATA-SURVEY: Migrant Acceptance Index: A Global Examination of the Relationship Between Interpersonal Contact and Attitudes toward Migrants

Author

Listed:
  • John H. Fleming

    (Gallup, United States)

  • Neli Esipova

    (The Gallup World Poll, United States)

  • Anita Pugliese

    (Gallup, United States)

  • Julie Ray

    (The Gallup World Poll, United States)

  • Rajesh Srinivasan

    (United States)

Abstract

Using independently sampled Gallup World Poll survey data from 140 countries, we explored the relationship between interpersonal contact and attitudes toward migrants from a perspective not typically found in the social psychological literature. We hypothesized that respondents who report personally knowing a migrant living in their home country would be more accepting of migrants generally (using a three-item Migrant Acceptance Index (MAI) score) than respondents who do not know a migrant. Results supported our hypothesis in 134 of the 140 countries suggesting that the strong relationship between interpersonal contact and attitudes toward migrants is near-universal. We also quantified migrant acceptance at the country level, finding a wide spectrum of attitudes toward migrants. Low acceptance countries were located primarily in Eastern and Southeastern Europe and high acceptance countries were located in Northern Europe and sub-Saharan Africa. We discuss these results in the context of interpersonal contact theory (Allport, 1954) and the larger context of global migration.

Suggested Citation

  • John H. Fleming & Neli Esipova & Anita Pugliese & Julie Ray & Rajesh Srinivasan, 2018. "DATA-SURVEY: Migrant Acceptance Index: A Global Examination of the Relationship Between Interpersonal Contact and Attitudes toward Migrants," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 8(1), pages 103-132, January-J.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:bcwpap:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:103-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/index.php/bc/article/view/576/541
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Sakoda, 1981. "A generalized index of dissimilarity," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(2), pages 245-250, May.
    2. United Nations (UN), 2016. "International Migration and Development," Working Papers id:11048, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ljubica Nedelkoska & Diego Martin & Alexia Lochmann & Ricardo Hausmann & Dany Bahar & Muhammed A. Yildirim, 2025. "De facto Openness to Immigration," Papers 2502.16407, arXiv.org.
    2. Sabina Kubiciel-Lodzinska & Jolanta Maj, 2020. "Experience in Employing Immigrants and the Perception of Benefits of a Diverse Workforce," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 803-818.
    3. Ljubica Nedelkoska & Diego A. Martin & Alexia Lochmann & Dany Bahar & Ricardo Hausmann & Muhammed A. Yildirim, 2025. "De Facto Openness to Immigration," Growth Lab Working Papers 245, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    4. Juan Sebastian Olier & Camilla Spadavecchia, 2022. "Stereotypes, disproportions, and power asymmetries in the visual portrayal of migrants in ten countries: an interdisciplinary AI-based approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0231794 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Michel Beine & Marco Delogu & Lionel Ragot, 2017. "The Role of Fees in Foreign Education: Evidence From Italy and the United Kingdom," Working Papers 2017-04, CEPII research center.
    3. Olga Alonso-Villar & Coral Del Río, 2025. "From the Extent of Segregation to its Consequences in Terms of Wellbeing," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 254(3), pages 5-43, September.
    4. Arcón, Victoria & Caridi, Inés, 2025. "Homogenization scales in residential segregation through random walkers," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Huh, Hyeon-Seung & Park, Cyn-Young, 2018. "Asia-Pacific regional integration index: Construction, interpretation, and comparison," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 22-38.
    6. Franklin J. James, 1986. "A New Generalized “Exposure-Based†Segregation Index," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 14(3), pages 301-316, February.
    7. Coral Río & Olga Alonso-Villar, 2022. "On Measuring Segregation in a Multigroup Context: Standardized Versus Unstandardized Indices," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 633-659, September.
    8. Dawid Kudas & Agnieszka Wnęk & Lucia Tátošová, 2022. "Land Use Mix in Functional Urban Areas of Selected Central European Countries from 2006 to 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Peter Lawrence, 2016. "Exodus: immigration and multiculturalism in the 21st century," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(148), pages 328-336, April.
    10. Ashley Jowell & Sharon Wulfovich & Sianga Kuyan & Catherine Heaney, 2018. "Ethnic identity, resilience, and well-being: a study of female Maasai migrants," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(6), pages 703-711, July.
    11. Selçuk Akçay, 2021. "Are Oil Prices and Remittance Outflows Asymmetric? Evidence From Saudi Arabia," Energy RESEARCH LETTERS, Asia-Pacific Applied Economics Association, vol. 1(1), pages 1-1.
    12. Piret Paal & Johannes Bükki, 2017. "“If I had stayed back home, I would not be alive any more…” – Exploring end-of-life preferences in patients with migration background," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Léa Kaufmann & Ranaivo Razakanirina & Derek Groen & Bastien Chopard, 2018. "Impact of immigrants on a multi-agent economical system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Frankel, David M. & Volij, Oscar, 2011. "Measuring school segregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 1-38, January.
    15. Joana Barros & Flavia F Feitosa, 2018. "Uneven geographies: Exploring the sensitivity of spatial indices of residential segregation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1073-1089, November.
    16. Mack, Miriam & Roeder, Sarah & Marchand, Katrin & Siegel, Melissa, 2020. "Intra-EU migration: Shedding light on drivers, corridors and the relative importance of migrant characteristics," MERIT Working Papers 2020-042, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Magdalena Górczyńska, 2017. "Gentrifiers in the post-socialist city? A critical reflection on the dynamics of middle- and upper-class professional groups in Warsaw," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 1099-1121, May.
    18. Mihai Mihaela & Țițan Emilia & Manea Daniela-Ioana, 2018. "Demographic Evolutions Premise for Digital Innovation in Health," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 293-298, December.
    19. Guy Abel, 2018. "Non-zero trajectories for long-run net migration assumptions in global population projection models," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(54), pages 1635-1662.
    20. Michel Beine & Marco Delogu & Lionel Ragot, 2020. "The role of fees in foreign education: evidence from Italy [Determinants of international student migration]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 571-600.
    21. Caige Sun & Tao Lin & Yu Zhao & Meixia Lin & Zhaowu Yu, 2017. "Residential Spatial Differentiation Based on Urban Housing Types—An Empirical Study of Xiamen Island, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:bcwpap:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:103-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.