China's trade reform: Verdoorn's Law married to Adam Smith's "vent for surplus" principle
The premise is that, as a member of the World Trade Organization, China's industrial trade practices are consistent with the principle of specialization in accordance with the principle of comparative advantage. Yet the trade reforms that were undertaken since the end of the Cultural Revolution (1976) have made direct foreign and joint investment primary vehicles for promoting export-centered industries that have become increasingly capital-intensive rather than labor-intensive. This paper argues that these reforms reflect policy initiatives that are more consistent with Verdoorn's Law and Adam Smith's "vent for surplus" principle than with the efficiency principles of conventional Ricardo-Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 26 (2004)
Issue (Month): 4 (October)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=109348|