IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v51y2015i5p915-944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Hypotheses on Commonality in Liquidity: New Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Author

Listed:
  • Paresh Kumar Narayan
  • Zhichao Zhang
  • Xinwei Zheng

Abstract

In this article, we examine four specific hypotheses relating to commonality in liquidity on the Chinese stock markets. These hypotheses are (1) that market-wide liquidity determines liquidity of individual stocks; (2) that liquidity varies with firm size; (3) that sectoral-based liquidity affects individual stock liquidities differently; and (4) that commonality in liquidity has an asymmetric effect. Drawing on a two-year data set on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges comprising over 34 million and 48 million transactions, respectively, we find strong support for commonality in liquidity and a greater influence of industry-wide liquidity in explaining liquidity of individual stocks. Moreover, our results suggest that of the three main sectors—financial, industrial, and resources—the industrial sector’s liquidity is most important in explaining individual stock liquidities. Finally, we do not find any evidence of size effects and document an asymmetric effect of market-wide liquidity on liquidity of individual stocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Paresh Kumar Narayan & Zhichao Zhang & Xinwei Zheng, 2015. "Some Hypotheses on Commonality in Liquidity: New Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(5), pages 915-944, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:51:y:2015:i:5:p:915-944
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1061799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1061799
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1061799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Hao & Luo, Xian & Han, Minghui & Liu, Xiaojuan, 2021. "Cultural diversity in ownership and stock liquidity commonality: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Muhammad Usman Arshad, 2021. "Forecasted E/P Ratio and ROE: Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE), China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    3. Li, Xing & Hou, Keqiang, 2023. "Over-weighting risk factor augmented with mutual fund managers' social networks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Kumar, Gaurav & Misra, Arun Kumar, 2018. "Commonality in liquidity: Evidence from India’s National Stock Exchange," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Syeda Hina Zaidi & Ramona Rupeika-Apoga, 2021. "Liquidity Synchronization, Its Determinants and Outcomes under Economic Growth Volatility: Evidence from Emerging Asian Economies," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Mohammad Tayeh, 2016. "Determinants of Market Liquidity: Evidence from the Jordanian Stock Market," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(10), pages 48-59, October.
    7. Joanna Olbrys, 2019. "Intra-market commonality in liquidity: new evidence from the Polish stock exchange," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 251-275, June.
    8. Joanna Olbryś & Elżbieta Majewska, 2020. "Assessing Commonality in Liquidity with Principal Component Analysis: The Case of the Warsaw Stock Exchange," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:51:y:2015:i:5:p:915-944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.