How to Fight (or Not to Fight) a Slowdown
The current global recession, along with the credit crisis, requires that the prevailing economic model be seriously debated and, these economists contend, reformed. The authors criticize the mainstream New Consensus approach in macroeconomics for its reliance on stabilization by means of monetary policies, its ill-designed approach to the role of wages and wage policies, and its complete neglect of fiscal policies. Instead, they argue that for macroeconomic stabilization the whole macroeconomic policy mix of monetary, fiscal, and wage policies, as well as open economy conditions, has to be considered. Based on this view, they analyze macroeconomic performance and macroeconomic policies in France, Germany, Sweden, and the UK between 1996 and 2005. They show that the widely differing success with respect to the degree of recovery after the 2000-2001 slowdown can be explained very plausibly by differences in the macroeconomic policy mix. However, there are important drawbacks in each case.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 52 (2009)
Issue (Month): 3 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=106043|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:52:y:2009:i:3:p:52-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.