IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev3rl/v3y2010ip35-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges in Using Mix Methods in Evaluation (English version)

Author

Listed:
  • Ph.D. Stefan COJOCARU

    () (Associate Professor, „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Iasi, Bd. Carol I no. 11,director of Holt Romania – Iasi, Childhood and Parenting Research Center, Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

This article explores the debates between quantitative and qualitative methods in the evaluation process, analyzes the challenges about methodological mix in terms of credibility and validity of data and tools, and the evaluation findings. Beyond the epistemological contradictions, it seems that, in terms of usefulness, the mixing of methods is a practical solution, along with hybrids theories, able to provide information to improve the sufficiency of the program. Mixing methods is also a way to reduce conflict between positivism and constructivism and an opportunity for increasing flexibility that the evaluator has in choosing the most appropriate methods for obtaininginformation in the assessment process.

Suggested Citation

  • Ph.D. Stefan COJOCARU, 2010. "Challenges in Using Mix Methods in Evaluation (English version)," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 3, pages 35-47, Octomber.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:3:y:2010:i::p:35-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://postmodernopenings.com/archives/192
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mix methods; credibility; internal validity; external validity; program evaluation.;

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:3:y:2010:i::p:35-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amariei Mirela). General contact details of provider: http://postmodernopenings.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.