IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v7y2011ip229-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comments to the Study: Savulescu J., Autonomy, the Good Life, and Controversial Choices, in , Rhodes R., Francis L.P., Silvers A. (eds.), 2007, The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp.: 17 – 37. (English version)

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio SANDU

    (postdoctoral fellow in > at University of medicine Gr T Popa Iasi , and ph.d lecturer at Mihail Kogalniceanu University from Iasi,)

Abstract

Julian Savulescu performs an analysis of the relationship between autonomy and the idea of a “good life”, starting from the perspective of controversial elections. The author shows that the choices based on individual values and different from the common ones, represent a challenge in generally, and particularly in medical ethics, which call into question the principle of action in the interest of the patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio SANDU, 2011. "Comments to the Study: Savulescu J., Autonomy, the Good Life, and Controversial Choices, in , Rhodes R., Francis L.P., Silvers A. (eds.), 2007, The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics, Blackwell Publish," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 7, pages 229-234, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:7:y:2011:i::p:229-234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistaromaneasca.ro/?p=207
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Julian Savulescu; authonomy; autenticity; bioethic;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:7:y:2011:i::p:229-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.