IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revaec/v36y2023i2d10.1007_s11138-022-00595-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diamonds are not forever: Adam Smith and Carl Menger on value and relative status

Author

Listed:
  • Jimena Hurtado

    (Universidad de los Andes)

  • Maria Pia Paganelli

    (Trinity University)

Abstract

The differences on value between Smith and Menger may be other from previously alleged if status is included as a need satisfied only by truly scarce goods. Given our innate desire to distinguish ourselves and be admired, Smith tells us that scarcity is what generates value. So, our desire for distinction is what drives our demand for “diamonds” and gives them value. But when “diamonds” become as abundant as “knitted stockings”, new forms of scarce status goods must be found. For Menger, value is also a dynamic, evolving “institution” that cannot be understood in a static analysis dealing only with supply and demand at a given moment. But abundance, for Menger, would simply allow us to fulfill higher-level needs. Thus, Smith, but not necessarily Menger, could explain why, as diamond rings, Prada shoes, and Gucci bags can be easily mass produced in identical but “fake” copies, irreproducible goods, such as charity donations and claims on digital art, are taking their place to indicate status in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimena Hurtado & Maria Pia Paganelli, 2023. "Diamonds are not forever: Adam Smith and Carl Menger on value and relative status," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 289-310, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:36:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11138-022-00595-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11138-022-00595-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11138-022-00595-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11138-022-00595-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray N. Rothbard, 1995. "Economic Thought Before Adam Smith," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 377.
    2. Erich Streissler, 1972. "To What Extent Was the Austrian School Marginalist?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 426-441, Fall.
    3. Michael Schneider, 2007. "The Nature, History and Significance of the Concept of Positional Goods," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 60-81, January.
    4. Toru Yamamori, 2017. "The concept of need in Adam Smith," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(2), pages 327-347.
    5. Giandomenica Becchio, 2014. "Social Needs, Social Goods, and Human Associations in the Second Edition of Carl Menger’s Principles," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 247-264, Summer.
    6. John Henry, 2000. "Adam Smith and the Theory Of Value: Chapter Six Considered," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Erwin Dekker, 2021. "The New Theory of Individual and Collective Needs in the Second Edition of Carl Menger’sPrinciples of Economics," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including A Symposium on Carl Menger at the Centenary of His Death, volume 39, pages 43-56, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    8. Claire Pignol & Benoît Walraevens, 2017. "Smith and Rousseau on envy in commercial societies," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1214-1246, November.
    9. repec:eme:rhet11:s0743-41542021000039b004 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David A. Harper & Anthony M. Endres, 2023. "Menger’s precursors in the German subjective-value tradition and his advancements in the theory of wants and goods," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 217-245, June.
    2. Vergés Josep C., 2000. "The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has To Say in the Age of Corruption," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, June.
    3. Kavaliou, A., 2020. "On the evaluation of Menger's theoretical evolution, or a story on "four Mengers"," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 45(1), pages 44-63.
    4. Sandra J. Peart & David M. Levy, 2023. "Menger and Jevons: beliefs and things," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 271-287, June.
    5. Robert Ekelund & Robert Tollison, 1997. "On neoinstitutional theory and preclassical economies: mercantilism revisited," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 375-399.
    6. van Dun Frank, 1995. "The Lawful And The Legal," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 6(4), pages 555-580, December.
    7. Festré, Agnès & Garrouste, Pierre, 2016. "Wieser As A Theorist Of Institutional Change," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(4), pages 463-483, December.
    8. José Luis Cendejas Bueno, 2021. "Justice and just price in Francisco de Vitoria's Commentary on Summa Theologica II-II q77," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Marian Eabrasu, 2008. "An Assessment of Subjectivism. Its Meaning and its Limits," ICER Working Papers 01-2008, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    10. Robert Prasch, 1998. "Book Reviews," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 234-236.
    11. Ivan Verbanov, 2003. "Forerunner of the Theories of the Free Market Economy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 72-88.
    12. Samuel Gregg, 2004. "Ethics And The Market Economy: Insights From Catholic Moral Theology," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 4-10, June.
    13. Panayotis G. Michaelides & John G. Milios & Angelos Vouldis & Spyros Lapatsioras, 2010. "Heterodox influences on Schumpeter," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 197-213, February.
    14. Chamilall Neelkant S. & Krecké Elisabeth, 2002. "Professor Kirzner on Carl Menger: To What Extent Was Carl Menger Subjectivist?," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-47, June.
    15. Hülsmann Jörg Guido, 2001. "More on Cantillon as a Proto-Austrian," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Altug Yalcintas & Isil Sirin Selcuk, 2016. "Research Ethics Education in Economics," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 53-74, March.
    17. Monroy-Gómez-Franco, Luis Angel, 2022. "The importance of positional mobility for regional comparisons," SocArXiv zgfvk_v1, Center for Open Science.
    18. Benito Arrunada, "undated". "Catholic Confessions of Sin as Third Party Moral Enforcement," Gruter Institute Working Papers on Law, Economics, and Evolutionary Biology 3-1-1013, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    19. José M. Menudo & José Mª O’kean, 2006. "The French Tradition. An alternative theoretical framework," Working Papers 06.24, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    20. Gilles Campagnolo & Sandye Gloria & Heinz Kurz & Richard Sturn, 2022. "On the modernity of Carl Menger: criss-cross views. Roundtable conversation," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 967-992, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:36:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11138-022-00595-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.