IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v55y1987i3p257-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional structure, finance, and race in higher education: Public-private sectoral differences

Author

Listed:
  • G. Sav

Abstract

This paper has examined and extended the range of economic implications implied by existing differences in the underlying institutional structure of higher education. Along the lines of Lindsay (1976), Sisk (1981), and Weisbrod (1977) it was hypothesized that public-private intersectoral and intrasectoral differences in the dependence on various sources of finance give rise to systematic differences in the input-output mix of institutions and lead to corresponding differences in blacks' relative access to and success in higher education. Empirical evidence was offered in support of the contention that blacks relative to whites are more likely to gain access to higher education through the public sector, but once entered, they (relative to whites) face a greater likelihood of success in the private compared to the public sector. Copyright Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1987

Suggested Citation

  • G. Sav, 1987. "Institutional structure, finance, and race in higher education: Public-private sectoral differences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 257-264, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:55:y:1987:i:3:p:257-264
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00124870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00124870
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00124870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blakemore, Arthur E & Low, Stuart A, 1983. "Scholarship Policy and Race-Sex Differences in the Demand for Higher Education," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 21(4), pages 504-519, October.
    2. Toma, Eugenia Froedge, 1983. "Institutional Structures, Regulation, and Producer Gains in the Education Industry," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(1), pages 103-116, April.
    3. G. Sav, 1986. "The politics of race in higher education: Governing boards and constituents," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 147-155, January.
    4. Lindsay, Cotton M, 1976. "A Theory of Government Enterprise," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(5), pages 1061-1077, October.
    5. Thomas Borcherding, 1977. "An economic approach to school integration: Public choice with tie-ins," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 53-77, September.
    6. David Sisk, 1981. "A theory of government enterprise: University Ph. D. production," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 357-363, January.
    7. Stigler, George J, 1970. "Director's Law of Public Income Redistribution," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brown, William O., 2001. "Sources of funds and quality effects in higher education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 289-295, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Sav, 1986. "The politics of race in higher education: Governing boards and constituents," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 147-155, January.
    2. Tzeremes, Nickolaos & Halkos, George, 2010. "A DEA approach for measuring university departments’ efficiency," MPRA Paper 24029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Rong-Ruey Duh & Kuo-Tay Chen & Ruey-Ching Lin & Li-Chun Kuo, 2014. "Do internal controls improve operating efficiency of universities?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 173-195, October.
    4. Richard Bozec, 2004. "L’analyse comparative de la performance entre les entreprises publiques et les entreprises privées : le problème de mesure et son impact sur les résultats," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 80(4), pages 619-654.
    5. Brett, Craig & Weymark, John A., 2016. "Voting over selfishly optimal nonlinear income tax schedules with a minimum-utility constraint," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 18-31.
    6. Francesc Amat & Pablo Beramendi & Miriam Hortas-Rico & Vicente Rios, 2020. "How inequality shapes political participation: The role of spatial patterns of political competition," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 2002, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    7. Lora, Eduardo, 2008. "El futuro de los pactos fiscales en América Latina," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 1310.
    8. Patrick Plane, 2021. "What Factors Drive transport and Logistics Costs in Africa ?," Working Papers hal-03198081, HAL.
    9. John Mutinda Mutiso & Prof. Maria Onyango & Dr. Michael Nyagol, 2015. "Effects of Funding Sources on Access to Quality Higher Education in Public Universities in Kenya: A Case Study," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 5(3), pages 68-81, March.
    10. Vaubel Roland, 2019. "Explaining Brexit: How the City of London came to be Regulated by the European Union," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-2, December.
    11. Micael Castanheira & Gaëtan Nicodème & Paola Profeta, 2012. "On the political economics of tax reforms: survey and empirical assessment," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 19(4), pages 598-624, August.
    12. Jerry Evensky, 1988. "An Expansion of the Neoclassical Horizon in Economics: The Rent–Seeking Research Program Brings in the Nuances of Social and Political Control," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 223-237, April.
    13. Berggren, Niclas & Bjørnskov, Christian, 2020. "Corruption, judicial accountability and inequality: Unfair procedures may benefit the worst-off," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 341-354.
    14. George Economides & Thomas Moutos, 2016. "Can Minimum Wages Raise Workers’ Incomes in the Long Run?," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 18(6), pages 961-978, December.
    15. James M. Poterba, 1996. "Government Intervention in the Markets for Education and Health Care: How and Why?," NBER Chapters, in: Individual and Social Responsibility: Child Care, Education, Medical Care, and Long-Term Care in America, pages 277-308, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Stanley L. Winer, 2016. "The Political Economy of Taxation: Power, Structure, Redistribution," Carleton Economic Papers 16-15, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    17. Sangeetha Gunasekar & Jayati Sarkar, 2014. "Does autonomy matter in state owned enterprises? Evidence from performance contracts in India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2014-034, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    18. John C. Weicher, 1971. "The Allocation of Police Protection By Income Class," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 207-220, October.
    19. Stanley L. Winer & Walter Hettich, 2002. "The Political Economy of Taxation: Positive and Normative Analysis when Collective Choice Matters," Carleton Economic Papers 02-11, Carleton University, Department of Economics, revised 2004.
    20. Santanu Gupta & Raghbendra Jha, 2016. "Democracy, redistribution and optimal tax structures," Departmental Working Papers 2016-13, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:55:y:1987:i:3:p:257-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.