IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Election periods and state tax policy cycles

Listed author(s):
  • John Mikesell

The policy and political outcomes that can be fruitfully studied using the electoral period as an analytic foundation range broadly. The present research has shown that much of the pattern of state tax policy change can be traced directly to that source. It suggests strongly that state parties are concerned with gaining and retaining political power and that the severity of public reaction declines with the passage of time. The outcome is a distinct rate change cycle with the broad based taxes. Beyond the apparent conclusion that tax reform efforts should be directed toward the first year of a gubernatorial term, there are some additional implications relating to other questions. First, the findings may help explain the relationship reported independently by Oates (1975, p. 150) and Goetz (1977, p. 184) that state governments with more income-elastic tax structures increase expenditure per capita by greater amount than those with less elastic structures. Politically, state governments find it rational to increase statutory rates of major taxes at two points in the election cycle (Y l-3 and Y l-1 ). A more elastic tax structure can provide greater funding between these politically attractive tax points. Another implication of the analysis is that the pattern of state tax policy changes may be economically destabilizing. The study clearly demonstrates the higher frequency of activity in the Y l-;3 and Y l-1 years. At the same time, a large number of states are on a 1974–1978 election cycle. Certain years are thus particularly likely to show major state tax increases, for certain reasons that have nothing to do with national aggregate demand policy. Fiscal policy, thus, must be prepared to counteract this potentially destabilizing force external to normal federal control. A final implication relates directly to state budgets. Some years are more likely to show new funds available for public programs because of the tax policy-electoral period cycle. These years will be substantially more attractive for budget expansion than would be others. Agencies subjected to zero base review in those years or proposing major new expenditure initiatives then may be expected to fare better than in other years. Copyright Martinus Nijhoff Publishers b.v 1978

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00154687
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Springer in its journal Public Choice.

Volume (Year): 33 (1978)
Issue (Month): 3 (January)
Pages: 99-106

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:33:y:1978:i:3:p:99-106
DOI: 10.1007/BF00154687
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.springer.com

Order Information: Web: http://www.springer.com/economics/public+finance/journal/11127/PS2

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as
in new window


  1. MacRae, C Duncan, 1977. "A Political Model of the Business Cycle," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(2), pages 239-263, April.
  2. Albert Breton, 1974. "The economic theory of representative government: A reply," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 129-133, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:33:y:1978:i:3:p:99-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)

or (Rebekah McClure)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.