IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v30y1977i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dilemma of a paretian liberal: Some consequences of Sen's theorem

Author

Listed:
  • John Aldrich

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • John Aldrich, 1977. "The dilemma of a paretian liberal: Some consequences of Sen's theorem," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:30:y:1977:i:1:p:1-21
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01718813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF01718813
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF01718813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibbard, Allan, 1974. "A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 388-410, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chetan Dave & Stefan Dodds, 2012. "Nosy Preferences, Benevolence, and Efficiency," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 78(3), pages 878-894, January.
    2. Roy Gardner, 1980. "The strategic inconsistency of Paretian liberalism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 241-252, January.
    3. Keith Dowding, 2004. "Social Choice and the Grammar of Rights and Freedoms," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(1), pages 144-161, March.
    4. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:30:y:2010:i:1:p:103-114 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Friedrich Breyer & Roy Gardner, 1980. "Liberal paradox, game equilibrium, and Gibbard optimum," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 469-481, January.
    6. Martin van Hees, 2000. "Negative Freedom And The Liberal Paradoxes," Rationality and Society, , vol. 12(3), pages 335-352, August.
    7. Wulf Gaertner, 1986. "Pareto, interdependent rights exercising and strategic behaviour," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 79-98, December.
    8. Cato, Susumu, 2013. "Remarks on Suzumura consistent collective choice rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 40-47.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Morselli, 2021. "Individual decisions and collective choices in the history of economic thought," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 77-96,97-11.
    2. Bezalel Peleg & Ron Holzman, 2017. "Representations of Political Power Structures by Strategically Stable Game Forms: A Survey," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Ben McQuillin & Robert Sugden, 2011. "The representation of alienable and inalienable rights: games in transition function form," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(4), pages 683-706, October.
    4. Stanley Reiter, 2001. "Interdependent Preferences and Groups of Agents," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 3(1), pages 27-67, January.
    5. Walter Bossert & Marc Fleurbaey, 2015. "An Interview with Kotaro Suzumura," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(1), pages 179-208, January.
    6. Kretz, Claudio, 2021. "Consistent rights on property spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. van Hees, Martin, 1999. "Liberalism, Efficiency, and Stability: Some Possibility Results," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 294-309, October.
    8. Alessandra F. Lütz & Marco Antonio Amaral & Ian Braga & Lucas Wardil, 2023. "Invasion of Optimal Social Contracts," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, May.
    9. S. Subramanian, 2006. "A sort of Paretian liberalism," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 311-324.
    10. Aitor Calo-Blanco, 2025. "Fairness with unequal productive skills among other-regarding individuals," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 23(1), pages 205-226, March.
    11. Wulf Gaertner, 1986. "Pareto, interdependent rights exercising and strategic behaviour," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 79-98, December.
    12. Edward Green, 1982. "Equilibrium and efficiency under pure entitlement systems," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 185-212, January.
    13. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2014. "Representation of constitutions under incomplete information," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 57(2), pages 279-302, October.
    14. Gardner, Roy, 1980. "Game-Theoretic Remarks on Gibbard's Libertarian Social Choice Functions," ISU General Staff Papers 198001010800001024, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2013. "Bezalel Peleg and Hans Peters: Strategic Social Choice. Stable Representations of Constitutions, Studies in choice and welfare, Springer, 2010, 154 pp," Post-Print hal-00666816, HAL.
    16. Friedrich Breyer & Roy Gardner, 1980. "Liberal paradox, game equilibrium, and Gibbard optimum," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 469-481, January.
    17. Marc Fleurbaey & Bertil Tungodden & Howard F. Chang, 2003. "Any Non-welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: A Comment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(6), pages 1382-1386, December.
    18. Herrade Igersheim, 2006. "Libéralisme de la liberté versus libéralisme du bonheur. Le cas du paradoxe libéral-parétien," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(3), pages 389-398.
    19. Berrens, Robert P. & Polasky, Stephen, 1995. "The Paretian Liberal Paradox and ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 45-56, July.
    20. Perote-Pena, Juan & Piggins, Ashley, 2005. "Pareto efficiency with spatial rights," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 265-283, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:30:y:1977:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.