IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/policy/v58y2025i1d10.1007_s11077-024-09554-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grandpa Joe’s hunting rifle: morality policy framing in Canadian Parliament

Author

Listed:
  • Noah S. Schwartz

    (University of the Fraser Valley)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Noah S. Schwartz, 2025. "Grandpa Joe’s hunting rifle: morality policy framing in Canadian Parliament," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(1), pages 163-178, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:58:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11077-024-09554-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11077-024-09554-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11077-024-09554-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11077-024-09554-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raymond Tatalovich & Dane G. Wendell, 2018. "Expanding the scope and content of morality policy research: lessons from Moral Foundations Theory," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 565-579, December.
    2. Anthony K. Fleming & Paul E. Rutledge & Gregory C. Dixon & J. Salvador Peralta, 2016. "When the Smoke Clears: Focusing Events, Issue Definition, Strategic Framing, and the Politics of Gun Control," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1144-1156, November.
    3. Trent Steidley & Cynthia G. Colen, 2017. "Framing the Gun Control Debate: Press Releases and Framing Strategies of the National Rifle Association and the Brady Campaign," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(2), pages 608-627, June.
    4. Gary Mucciaroni & Kathleen Ferraiolo & Meghan E. Rubado, 2019. "Framing morality policy issues: state legislative debates on abortion restrictions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(2), pages 171-189, June.
    5. Donley Studlar & Gordon Burns, 2015. "Toward the permissive society? Morality policy agendas and policy directions in Western democracies," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 273-291, September.
    6. Anthony Fleming & Dylan S. McLean & Raymond Tatalovich, 2018. "Debating Gun Control in Canada and the United States: Divergent Policy Frames and Political Cultures," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 181(4), pages 348-371, December.
    7. Dylan S. McLean, 2018. "Gun Talk Online: Canadian Tools, American Values," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(3), pages 977-992, September.
    8. Jae‐Hee Jung, 2020. "The Mobilizing Effect of Parties' Moral Rhetoric," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 341-355, April.
    9. Caillin Langmann, 2020. "Effect of firearms legislation on suicide and homicide in Canada from 1981 to 2016," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Leenaars, Antoon A. & Lester, David, 2001. "The impact of gun control (Bill C-51) on homicide in Canada," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 287-294.
    11. Donley T. Studlar & Alessandro Cagossi, 2018. "Institutions and Morality Policy in Western Democracies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(1), pages 61-88, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna M. Crawford & Christopher M. Weible, 2024. "The political polarization over abortion: An analysis of advocacy coalition belief systems," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 599-620, September.
    2. Dane G. Wendell & Raymond Tatalovich, 2021. "Classifying public policies with Moral Foundations Theory," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 155-182, March.
    3. Job P. H. Vossen & Gabriëlle L. Pooter & Petra Meier, 2022. "Conceptualizing morality policy: a dyadic morality frame analysis of a gendered legislative debate on abortion," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 185-207, March.
    4. Raymond Tatalovich & Donald P. Haider‐Markel, 2022. "Voting on gun rights: Mapping the electoral scope of the pro‐gun constituency in America," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(6), pages 1359-1370, November.
    5. Vincenzo Galasso & Massimo Morelli & Tommaso Nannicini & Piero Stanig, 2022. "Fighting Populism on Its Own Turf: Experimental Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 9789, CESifo.
    6. Eva Thomann, 2018. "“Donate your organs, donate life!” Explicitness in policy instruments," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 433-456, December.
    7. Humberto Nicolini & Juan Pablo Sánchez-de la Cruz & Rosa Giannina Castillo Avila & María Lilia López-Narvaéz & Thelma Beatríz González-Castro & Sophia Chávez-Manjarrez & José Eduardo Montes-de-Oca & J, 2022. "Gender Differences in Suicide and Homicide Rates in Mexico City during 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
    8. Shawn Ratcliff, 2022. "Presidential firepower: The effect of the presidential party on gun ownership, 1980–2018," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(3), pages 737-751, May.
    9. Galasso, Vincenzo & Morelli, Massimo & Nannicini, Tommaso & Stanig, Piero, 2024. "The Populist Dynamic: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Countering Populism," IZA Discussion Papers 16796, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Jennifer Hubbert & Hannah Eaton, 2024. "More than the Second Amendment: Liberal gun owners, citizenship, and emancipatory democracy in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(2), pages 211-225, March.
    11. Sheerin, Corina & Garavan, Thomas, 2022. "Female leaders as ‘Superwomen’: Post-global financial crisis media framing of women and leadership in investment banking in UK print media 2014–2016," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    12. Raymond Tatalovich & Dane G. Wendell, 2018. "Expanding the scope and content of morality policy research: lessons from Moral Foundations Theory," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 565-579, December.
    13. Terrence D. Hill & Benjamin Dowd‐Arrow & Amy M. Burdette & Tara D. Warner, 2020. "Gun Ownership and Life Satisfaction in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(5), pages 2121-2136, September.
    14. Christoph Knill & Xavier Fernández‐i‐Marín & Emma Budde & Stephan Heichel, 2020. "Religious tides: The time‐variant effect of religion on morality policies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 256-270, April.
    15. Maria Clara Figueiredo Dalla Costa Ames & Mauricio Custódio Serafim, 2023. "Multiple Cases of Pro-life Volunteering in a Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Approach," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 27(Vol. 27 N), pages 210315-2103.
    16. Göral, Elif & Hannum, Christopher M., 2024. "The effect of moral framing on attitudes towards offshore wind farms in Turkey," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    17. Caillin Langmann, 2020. "Effect of firearms legislation on suicide and homicide in Canada from 1981 to 2016," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Teodóra Szép & Sander Cranenburgh & Caspar Chorus, 2024. "Moral rhetoric in discrete choice models: a Natural Language Processing approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 179-206, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:58:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11077-024-09554-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.