IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jrefec/v22y2001i2-3p141-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of Political Mechanisms for Citing Nuisance Facilities: Are Opponents More Likely to Participate Than Supporters?

Author

Listed:
  • Mansfield, Carol
  • Van Houtven, George
  • Huber, Joel

Abstract

Public opposition often hinders the siting of nuisance and noxious facilities. However, there is often support for the siting plan within the community, especially when the facility will bring economic development or a compensation package funded by the company siting the facility. Why have opponents of these facilities been so effective compared to supporters? This article presents evidence that opponents of siting proposals are much more likely to vote or engage in other collective action, while supporters are more likely to remain passive and not take action to advance their position. The results suggest that political mechanisms for determining host communities for facilities such as town meetings or referenda may not accurately represent the preferences of the community and that opportunities for siting may be missed. Copyright 2001 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Mansfield, Carol & Van Houtven, George & Huber, Joel, 2001. "The Efficiency of Political Mechanisms for Citing Nuisance Facilities: Are Opponents More Likely to Participate Than Supporters?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2-3), pages 141-161, March-May.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jrefec:v:22:y:2001:i:2-3:p:141-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0895-5638/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garrone, Paola & Groppi, Angelamaria, 2012. "Siting locally-unwanted facilities: What can be learnt from the location of Italian power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 176-186.
    2. Carol Mansfield & George L. Van Houtven & Joel Huber, 2002. "Compensating for Public Harms: Why Public Goods Are Preferred to Money," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 78(3), pages 368-389.
    3. Hamersma, Marije & Heinen, Eva & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos, 2016. "Residents’ responses to proposed highway projects: Exploring the role of governmental information provision," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 56-67.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jrefec:v:22:y:2001:i:2-3:p:141-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.