Filtering in Office Markets: Evidence from Medium-Size Cities
Filtering, a change in the quality of use for a structure, has been studied extensively in housing. However, there are reasons to believe that the phenomenon is at least as significant in office markets. Reasons to expect filtering in office markets are presented in this article. Then evidence of filtering is examined from two medium-size cities. The findings are strongly consistent with the presumed effects of filtering. As expected, evidence of filtering is least significant for large downtown highrise offices, more significant among clustered suburban office buildings, and most significant among isolated office buildings.
Volume (Year): 7 (1992)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: American Real Estate Society Clemson University School of Business & Behavioral Science Department of Finance 401 Sirrine Hall Clemson, SC 29634-1323|
Web page: http://www.aresnet.org/
|Order Information:|| Postal: Diane Quarles American Real Estate Society Manager of Member Services Clemson University Box 341323 Clemson, SC 29634-1323|
Web: http://pages.jh.edu/jrer/about/get.htm Email:
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Wayne R. Archer, 1981. "Determinants of Location for General Purpose Office Firms within Medium Size Cities," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 9(3), pages 283-297.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jre:issued:v:7:n:2:1992:p:125-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (JRER Graduate Assistant/Webmaster)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.