Spatial Concentration of Institutional Property Ownership: New Wave Atomistic or Traditional Urban Clustering
NCREIF investors acquire property in counties that meet socioeconomic filtering criteria. In contrast to atomistic predictions, these investors acquire their apartment buildings, offices, retail facilities, and warehouses in density clusters. These clusters follow a model of a negative exponential demand curve, a model that previously explained the technologically caused density gradient of urban areas. Institutional investors signal their belief that clustering of properties is a value dimension.
Volume (Year): 12 (1996)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.aresnet.org/
|Order Information:|| Postal: Diane Quarles American Real Estate Society Manager of Member Services Clemson University Box 341323 Clemson, SC 29634-1323|
Web: http://pages.jh.edu/jrer/about/get.htm Email:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Wayne R. Archer, 1981. "Determinants of Location for General Purpose Office Firms within Medium Size Cities," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 9(3), pages 283-297.
- Marilyn Rubin & Ilene Wagner & Pearl Kamer, 1978. "Industrial Migration: A Case Study of Destination by City-Surburban Origin within the New York Metropolitan Area," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 6(4), pages 417-437.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jre:issued:v:12:n:3:1996:p:413-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (JRER Graduate Assistant/Webmaster)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.