IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v16y2026i3p52.html

Symbolic Anthropology and Literary Analysis: The Scarlet Letter as a Lens for Modern Social Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Reji George

Abstract

This study examines Nathaniel Hawthorne's masterpiece, The Scarlet Letter (1850), through a comprehensive analysis of its symbolic framework, addressing whether the novel's abstract elements are symbolic or merely allegorical. The novel amalgamates psychological intuition with symbolic depiction to explore themes of sin, guilt, and redemption. The research aims to analyze how Hawthorne employs symbolic elements in creating characters and situations, gauge the validity of these symbolic representations in distinguishing between allegory and symbolism, demonstrate how these symbols match real characters and happenings, and examine their contemporary relevance in addressing modern social issues. Drawing on symbolic anthropology, including Turner's (1967) and Geertz's (1973) interpretive approaches, the study adopts a qualitative descriptive methodology to scientifically analyze the novel’s major symbols. The findings reveal that the symbols effectively operate across literal and figurative levels, surpassing allegory in illustrating societal realities. These results offer significant input for addressing contemporary social problems through literary depiction and analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Reji George, 2026. "Symbolic Anthropology and Literary Analysis: The Scarlet Letter as a Lens for Modern Social Issues," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 16(3), pages 1-52, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/27129/17483
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/27129
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.