IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v16y2026i3p351.html

Development and Validation of a Reading-Writing Module to Enhance Students' Critical Thinking and EFL Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Tian Li
  • Mohamad Termizi Borhan
  • Simranjeet Kaur Judge

Abstract

This study reports the development and content validation of a reading–writing module for Chinese EFL undergraduates. The module integrates Paul–Elder critical thinking framework into a POA instructional process. Guided by the ADDIE model, a needs analysis was conducted with university English instructors, and a CT‑POA module was then designed and developed. Content validity was examined using the Content Validity Index (CVI) by four experts rated on a 4-point scale. All items achieved item-level CVI (I-CVI) of 1.00, and the scale-level CVI (S-CVI/Ave) was 1.00, indicating unanimous expert agreement on relevance and clarity. The findings suggest positive content validity and alignment with instructional objectives in the Chinese college EFL context. It can be concluded the content validity of the module meets the threshold of the CVI and can be used to test the causal effects on students' critical thinking and writing performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian Li & Mohamad Termizi Borhan & Simranjeet Kaur Judge, 2026. "Development and Validation of a Reading-Writing Module to Enhance Students' Critical Thinking and EFL Writing," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 16(3), pages 351-351, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/28605/17608
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/28605
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.