Author
Abstract
The present study investigates the production of the English past tense marker –ed by two qualitatively different groups of second language (L2) learners , namely, native speakers of Thai and Spanish. Several current models in L2 phonology are critically evaluated in order to explain variation in learners' production of functional morphemes. These models include the Organic Grammar Hypothesis (OGH), the Failed Functional Features Hypothesis (FFFH), the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis (PTH), and the Phonological Reduction Hypothesis (PRH). The study argues that the Optimality Theoretic model provides a dynamic and predictive account of interlanguage variation. Before analyzing the variable productions of the learners, the phonological system of codas in Thai and Spanish is analyzed to determine the constraint rankings in the learners' L1s. The ranking of Thai is *COMPLEXCODA, *VOICED-CODA >>; DEP-IO >> MAX-IO; in the case of Spanish, *COMPLEXCODA]WORD, *[d]CODA >> DEP-IO >> MAX-IO. According to these constraint rankings, two predictions were proposed- (1) high-ranked markedness constraints in the L1 grammars of Thai and Spanish lead learners to make errors when producing verbs marked with –ed, and (2) the strategy of deleting the second element of consonant clusters is preferred to inserting a vowel in learners' productions. The results show that most learners successfully produced VV-d and CV-d verbs but encountered difficulties with complex clusters. Furthermore, the learners tended to choose the strategy of deletion over epenthesis in the structures of consonant clusters. The current findings suggest that constraint re-ranking in learners' interlanguage grammars accounts for the variable productions of the morphological marker –ed. This analysis supports the ability of OT to explain both accuracy and variation in L2 morphological production.
Suggested Citation
Metab Alhoody, 2026.
"An OT Approach to Spanish and Thai Learners' Production of Past Tense Markers in L2 English,"
World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 16(3), pages 305-305, December.
Handle:
RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:305
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:3:p:305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.