IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v16y2026i2p309.html

Bridging or Dividing? Chinese Language Integration and the Resilience of ELT in Saudi Higher Education under Vision 2030: Policy Symbolism vs. Pedagogical Realities

Author

Listed:
  • Gaus Chowdhury
  • Javed Ahmad
  • Nisar Ahmad Koka
  • Anjum Mishu

Abstract

Saudi Arabia has pledged to attract international investments as part of its Vision 2030 policy, one that seeks to diversify the education and economic environment of the country, especially by enhancing alliances with China. In support of this objective, some higher education institutions have established or initiated the teaching of the Chinese language within English-dominant educational environments, in addition to the currently taught English Language courses. This paper examines the implementation of Chinese in ELT practices in Saudi Arabia, focusing on the deployment of institutional methodologies, stakeholder viewpoints, and the ideological consequences of the policy-based multilingual curriculum revolution. The study employs a multiple-case design that is based on language policy and planning (Ricento, 2006) and translingual pedagogies (Garcia & Wei, 2014). It relies on semi-structured interviews and responses to these interviews by key stakeholders of the case, as well as analysis of institutional documents and a faculty, administrative, and student survey. Insights indicate an ongoing antagonism between English as a linguistic capital of dominance (Bourdieu, 1991) and the novel valorisation of Chinese as a diplomatic language of the state. The research offers critical perspectives on how Saudi higher education navigates the linguistic pluralism of Vision 2030's framework and suggests implications for multilingual curriculum design, trainer preparation, and language policy implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaus Chowdhury & Javed Ahmad & Nisar Ahmad Koka & Anjum Mishu, 2026. "Bridging or Dividing? Chinese Language Integration and the Resilience of ELT in Saudi Higher Education under Vision 2030: Policy Symbolism vs. Pedagogical Realities," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 16(2), pages 309-309, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/28645/17378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/28645
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.