Author
Listed:
- Lu Zhang
- Hanita Hanim Ismail
- Nur Ainil Sulaiman
Abstract
Content-Based Instruction (CBI) has been widely promoted as an effective approach for integrating language development with subject matter learning in English as a Foreign Language contexts. However, limited empirical evidence exists comparing the effects of different CBI models on students' reading proficiency, particularly within Chinese tertiary education. Existing studies often focus on general outcomes or perceptions, leaving a gap in understanding how specific instructional models influence distinct reading sub-skills. This study aimed to address this gap by comparing the effectiveness of three CBI models (theme-based, adjunct, and sheltered) on university students' English reading proficiency, focusing on three sub-skills- understanding explicit information, understanding implicit information, and using linguistic features to understand texts. Employing a mixed-methods design, the study involved 105 Chinese university students across three intact classes, with quantitative data collected from the English reading pretest and posttest and qualitative data collected from classroom observations and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative results indicated that while all groups improved significantly from pretest to posttest, the theme-based model led to significantly higher gains in total reading scores and in the ability to use linguistic cues. Qualitative findings suggested that the instructional design, input organization, and opportunities for textual scaffolding varied across models and contributed to the outcomes. These findings offer practical implications for EFL curriculum planners and educators seeking to align reading instruction with model-specific strengths for more effective literacy development.
Suggested Citation
Lu Zhang & Hanita Hanim Ismail & Nur Ainil Sulaiman, 2026.
"Theme-Based, Sheltered, or Adjunct? Evaluating CBI Models for Improving English Reading Skills in Chinese EFL Classrooms,"
World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 16(2), pages 282-282, March.
Handle:
RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:282
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.